Jump to content

User talk:Frank Schulenburg

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 5 days ago by FPCBot in topic FP Promotion
Babel
This user has been on Wikimedia Commons for
20 years, 3 months and 18 days
This user is a member of the Commons Photographers User Group.
de


en-4
fr-3
la-2
This user has uploaded 925 quality images to Wikimedia Commons.
This user has uploaded 7 valued images to Wikimedia Commons.
This user has uploaded 169 featured pictures to Wikimedia Commons.
This user has uploaded 2 featured media to Wikimedia Commons.
This user has uploaded 4 finalist to Pictures of the Year to Wikimedia Commons.
This user has file mover rights on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)


Archive of former discussions: (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Pue Warehouse, Tehama (2024)-L1006649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your most memorable shot of 2024

[edit]

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2024? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2025. Warmly, --Ailura (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ACC Warehouse, Glenn County (2025)-L1006691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 01:05, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presidio of Santa Barbara, Chapel (2025)-L1006716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:00, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presidio of Santa Barbara, Chapel (2025)-L1006772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:00, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presidio of Santa Barbara, Northwest Corner (2025)-L1006720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:50, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presidio of Santa Barbara (2025)-L1006745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:25, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presidio of Santa Barbara (2025)-L1006753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridgeport Historic District, Sign (2025)-L1006880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 10 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridgeport Covered Bridge (2025)-L1006843.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridgeport Covered Bridge (2025)-L1006838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:24, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Java Detour, Red Bluff (2025)-L1006903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Bluff State Theatre, box office (2025)-L1006894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Immaculate Conception, Smartsville (2025)-L1006828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 20:23, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Western Canal (2025)-L1006914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:25, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Western Canal (2025)-L1006926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:25, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Butte Creek (2025)-L1006909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:25, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beehives in Butte County (2025)-104A8316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 02:06, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Almond Blossom in Butte County (2025)-104A8325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:29, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beehives in Butte County (2025)-104A8312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 08:08, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Almond Blossom in Butte County (2025)-104A8325.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Almond Blossom in Butte County (2025)-104A8325.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 8 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Presidio of Santa Barbara, Chapel (2025)-L1006772.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Presidio of Santa Barbara, Chapel (2025)-L1006772.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Llano Seco Unit (2024)-L1006548.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Llano Seco Unit (2024)-L1006548.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tjuvholmen, Sauna (2024)-L1006528.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tjuvholmen, Sauna (2024)-L1006528.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki For Minorities in the Middle East and North Africa Contest – Join Us!

[edit]

Hello Frank Schulenburg,

Greetings from the Wiki For Minorities Team! We are excited to announce Wiki For Minorities in the Middle East and North Africa Contest.

An initiative aimed at highlighting the cultural, religious, and ethnic diversity of the region through photography. The contest seeks to crown the best and most beautiful images that document the lives of minorities in the Middle East and North Africa, showcasing their traditions, customs, and unique environments. This competition provides photographers with an opportunity to capture and share the stories of these communities through images that reflect their identity and heritage, contributing to greater awareness and appreciation of the region’s rich social fabric.

How Can I Contribute?

[edit]

It’s simple! Grab your camera, smartphone, or recording device, and start capturing photos, videos, or audio that tell the story of Minorities in the Middle East and North Africa. Once you’ve collected your media, head over to the Wiki For Minorities in the Middle East and North Africa Contest page and click on the Upload Now icon to submit your entry.

Timeline

[edit]

Submission Period: March 15, 2025, 00:01 (UTC)April 30, 2025, 23:59 (UTC)

Countries

[edit]

Iraq, Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Somalia, Kuwait, Morocco, Yemen, Tunisia, Oman, Syria, Palestine, Qatar, Lebanon, Libya, Egypt, Mauritania, Turkey, Iran, Cyprus

Prizes

[edit]

The best 4 images:

  • 1st prize: 300 USD
  • 2nd prize: 200 USD
  • 3rd prize: 100 USD
  • 4th prize: 50 USD

Join us now! and upload your images

Warm regards,
On behalf of the Wiki For Minorities team
--Rotana (talk) 07:19, 13 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Behavioral and Social Sciences Building, Chico State (2025)-104A8419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Behavioral and Social Sciences Building, Chico State (2025)-104A8420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Misión San Luis Rey de Francia-7839.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Misión San Luis Rey de Francia-7839.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chico State, Kendall Hall (2024)-L1006102.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chico State, Kendall Hall (2024)-L1006102.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Email!

[edit]

Hi Frank,

I just wanted to let you know that I have sent you an email. Please check when you have a moment. Have a good day! ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:14, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Honey Run Covered Bridge (2025)-104A8503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The focus seems to be a bit out of place, not where I would have expected it (on the entrance portal), but rather a bit to the left. Additionally, there's unsharpness visible at full resolution towards the back. At F/9 on fullframe, that could be diffraction instead of bokeh, but I'm not sure. Anyway, these points would be the difference between QI and FP, so I'm OK with a promotion. --Grand-Duc 16:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Masonic Temple in Orland, California-L1001527.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Masonic Temple in Orland, California-L1001527.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People of Butte County – Tod Kimmelshue (2025)-104A8824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People of Butte County – Tod Kimmelshue (2025)-104A8815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Table Mountain Ecological Reserve (2025)-L1007029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ice cream vending machine, Tiburon (2025)-104A8766.jpg

[edit]
العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ice cream vending machine, Tiburon (2025)-104A8766.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Didym (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Soft drink and snack vending machines, Chico (2025)-L1007024.jpg

[edit]
العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Soft drink and snack vending machines, Chico (2025)-L1007024.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Didym (talk) 22:22, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:People of Butte County – Tod Kimmelshue (2025)-104A8815.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:People of Butte County – Tod Kimmelshue (2025)-104A8824.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chico Wildflower Century (2025)-104A9764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 21:16, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Soft drink and snack vending machines, Chico (2025)-L1007024.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alraunenstern (talk) 07:41, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Frank Schulenburg, I've filed an objection to Didym's quick-delete request. This will move the photo to the regular deletion discussion. There, I explained why I don't think it should be deleted. Best regards, --Alraunenstern (talk) 08:08, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A. H. Chapman House, Chico (2025)-L1007056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A. H. Chapman House, Chico (2025)-L1007064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:30, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chico Wildflower Century (2025)-104A9764.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chico Wildflower Century (2025)-104A9764.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Temple among the Forest beneath the Clouds, Weaverville (2025)-L1007085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Temple among the forest Beneath the Clouds, Weaverville (2025)-L1007132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:20, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:The Temple among the forest Beneath the Clouds, Weaverville (2025)-L1007132.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Temple among the forest Beneath the Clouds, Weaverville (2025)-L1007132.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Aristeas-test (talk) 08:45, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A. H. Chapman House, Chico (2025)-L1007055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 17:08, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper Bidwell Park (2025)-L1007181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very good quality! --Granada 16:50, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial Day Ceremony Chico Cemetery (2025)-104A1849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:33, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silver Dollar Fair (2025)-104A1750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:57, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silver Dollar Fair (2025)-104A1802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:57, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silver Dollar Fair (2025)-104A1787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:21, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lee-Mansfield House, Chico (2025)-L1007227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:00, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noonan-Phoenix Building, Chico (2025)-L1007246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:07, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colusa Hall, California State University, Chico (2025)-L1007258.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:07, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 33 Bloor East, Entrance (2025)-L1007263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:32, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yonge Street, Toronto (2025)-L1007301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yonge Street, Toronto (2025)-L1007274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Temple among the Forest beneath the Clouds, Weaverville (2025)-L1007115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:33 Bloor East, Entrance (2025)-L1007263.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:33 Bloor East, Entrance (2025)-L1007263.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female northern elephant seals at the beach of Año Nuevo State Park-2416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 14 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female northern elephant seals at the beach of Año Nuevo State Park-2416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! First Palo Alto United Methodist Church (2025)-L1007338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:No Kings protest in Chico (2025)-104A2073.jpg

[edit]
File:No Kings protest in Chico (2025)-104A2073.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello from WLBangla!

[edit]

Hi @Frank Schulenburg,

I hope this message finds you well. We’ve sent you an email regarding Wiki Loves Bangla 2025, which requires your kind attention at your earliest convenience. We would greatly appreciate it if you could take a moment to review it. Thank you so much in advance! Moheen (keep talking) 21:14, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the reminder, Moheen! Done. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:44, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gates Computer Science Building (2025)-L1007406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:52, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford ChEM-H Building (2025)-L1007363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford Building 420 (2025)-L1007366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church (2025)-L1007381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The strange thing about perspective is that the columns on the facade are vertical, but the facade itself - especially the windows - are tilted, and even the steps under Jesus' feet are tilted, although this is a painting, not an architectural detail. Meanwhile in other photos in the category, everything looks proportional. --Екатерина Борисова 01:59, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Екатерина Борисова, it's a slight side view, not a frontal. --Frank Schulenburg 02:14, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
I understand, but still have mixed feelings about these tilts. --Екатерина Борисова 02:58, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
If you photograph a straight line (like the steps under Jesus' feet here) from the side, it's not straight anymore. I'm at a loss about how to resolve this… --Frank Schulenburg 16:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support OK for me. The slight perspective distortion is a natural result of the side angle - it realistically documents the architecture and, from a photographic point of view, does not preclude QI status, IMO.. --Radomianin 21:41, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Comment It still looks strange to me, even considering the peculiarities of shooting from the side, as if it were an AI joke (I'm not saying that it was the AI that did the processing), but the image quality is excellent, so I won't argue. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:15, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:First Palo Alto United Methodist Church (2025)-L1007338.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:First Palo Alto United Methodist Church (2025)-L1007338.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Center for Clinical Sciences Research, Stanford University (2025)-L1007419.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Center for Clinical Sciences Research, Stanford University (2025)-L1007419.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Aristeas-test (talk) 08:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placer County Courthouse (2025)-L1007436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercantile Building & Ford Model A Roadster (2025)-L1007475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 01:27, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auburn Fire House No. 2 (2025)-L1007441.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:41, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brye House, Auburn (2025)-L1007486.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
May be few CAs, especially on the left building. Otherwise very good. --Sebring12Hrs 16:41, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Sebring12Hrs: I uploaded a new version. --Frank Schulenburg 01:33, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:57, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 11:43, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Johnson & Selleck (Daily Alta California, Volume 4, Number 254, 23 September 1853).png

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ತುಳು  Türkçe  українська  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Johnson & Selleck (Daily Alta California, Volume 4, Number 254, 23 September 1853).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chico 4th of July Parade 2025-104A2287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:19, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chico 4th of July Parade 2025-104A2291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:19, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chico 4th of July Parade 2025-104A2311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:19, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forbestown Masonic Lodge (2025)-L1007490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:23, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forbestown Cemetery (2025)-L1007526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:23, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forbestown Cemetery (2025)-L1007523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 13:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco Columbarium (2025)-L1007559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco Columbarium (2025)-L1007549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco Columbarium (2025)-L1007554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco Columbarium (2025)-L1007543.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:27, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco Columbarium (2025)-L1007571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:28, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco Columbarium (2025)-L1007563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:25, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Photographers User Group meetup

[edit]

Will there be an online meetup this month or next? I'm not seeing it in Category:Commons Photographers User Group meetings Jim.henderson (talk) 06:44, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jim, sorry for the delayed response. I’ve been meaning to organize another online meeting for some time now. However, I got sidetracked after starting work on a research paper for a California history journal—something unrelated to Wikipedia. Lately, I’ve been feeling the need to focus on a few personal priorities (what you might call “unfinished business”) that I’d really like to see through. That said, once I can clear a bit of space in my schedule, organizing a a meeting for our group will likely move back up on my priority list. Thanks for reaching out. It really feels like it’s been a while. I hope all is well on your end. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

FPC File:Puits Rodolphe 01.jpg

[edit]

Due to the voters' comments and the stacking errors pointed out by Milseburg, I've decided to return to the original version. Please check the nomination page again. Greetings and thanks --Llez (talk) 05:42, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Magalia Community Church (2024)-L1004302.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tunnels along the North Fork Feather River (2025)-L1007580.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:15, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Fork Feather River (2025)-L1007606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elephant Butte Tunnel (2025)-L1007598.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Espandero 21:12, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Magalia Community Church (2024)-L1004302.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Magalia Community Church (2024)-L1004302.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/Aristeas-test (talk) 10:23, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cliff Lake, Lassen Volcanic National Park-8179.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cliff Lake, Lassen Volcanic National Park-8179.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2025 Deutschland

[edit]

Hallo Frank Schulenburg,

Sieger 2024 – Verladeturm Oderhafen

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2025 findet zum 15. Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat User:GPSLeo mit dem Verladeturm Oderhafen Groß Neuendorf während eines Hochwassers gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2024 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel in Greiz in Thüringen oder in Königslutter am Elm in Niedersachsen. Nachdem es in Thüringen über lange Zeit nicht überall Kulturdenkmallisten gab, ist dieses Bundesland jetzt fast vollständig abgedeckt und die Listen freuen sich über Fotos. Hier findest du einen Einstieg in die Thüringer Listen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Bilder zum Thema „Bauernhöfe und Bauernhäuser“ ausgelobt.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2025 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang November tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2025 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 19:09, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 470 B Street, Biggs (2025)-L1000115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:08, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colonia Building, Biggs (2025)-L1000110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Top Rice Growers, Biggs (2025)-L1000127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:26, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangor Church (2025)-L1000175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Richvale, Richvale Café (2025)-L1000163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 18:35, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Richvale, Community Church (2025)-L1000153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 18:35, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nelson, Market & U.S. Post Office (2025)-L1000165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 18:35, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palermo, California, Post Office (2025)-L1000140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:42, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bangor Church (2025)-L1000175.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bangor Church (2025)-L1000175.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

[edit]
2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2023 Picture of the Year contest.

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

[edit]

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now! If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Commons Photographers User Group Virtual Meeting, October 2025

[edit]

Hello Frank Schulenburg!

You are receiving this message because you are one of our esteemed members of the Commons Photographers User Group.

You are invited to the next virtual meeting of the Commons Photographers User Group! This is a great opportunity to connect, discuss important updates, and plan for the future of our group. Please register for the event using the link below!

Agenda:

  1.   Welcome and CPUG Updates
  2.   Upcoming Election
  3.   Commons Conference
  4.   Community Updates
  5.   Other topics

Date and Time

[edit]
  •   Date: Sunday, October 12, 2025
  •   Time: 4:00 PM UTC (Check your local time)
  •   Venue: Online (Google Meet link will be shared closer to the date on Registration page)
  •   Register here: Sign up on Meta-Wiki


We look forward to seeing you there!

Thank You, -- Suyash Dwivedi (💬) 19:26, 2 October 2025 (UTC) - (Chair, CPUG)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pickhubenbrücke, Kleines Fleet und St. Katharinen (2025)-L1000197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schulstraße 7, Stadensen (2025)-L1000246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. Beautiful --Gower 13:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:53, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SUB Göttingen, Eingangsbereich (2025)-L1000255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I like the composition. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pickhubenbrücke, Kleines Fleet und St. Katharinen (2025)-L1000197.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pickhubenbrücke, Kleines Fleet und St. Katharinen (2025)-L1000197.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply