Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2025/07/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
Copyright infringement Donnermar2 (talk) 00:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom COM:COPYVIO: https://ch.pinterest.com/pin/919297342735042057/. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 03:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
{{cc-by-nc-nd-2.0}} Varsaw12 (talk) 08:28, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
{{cc-by-nc-nd-2.0}} Varsaw12 (talk) 08:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
اشتباه شده است سحر غفوری (talk) 10:18, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
اشتباه شده است سحر غفوری (talk) 10:45, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
اشتباه شده است سحر غفوری (talk) 10:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
File deleted under COM:CSD#G7. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Flickr import failed to ascertain license: accidentally uploaded CC Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic. ProtoKiwi (talk) 08:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:52, 6 July 2025 UTC: Flickr import failed to ascertain license: accidentally uploaded CC Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic. --Krdbot 13:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Heroesdx9 (talk) 10:50, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Heroesdx9 (talk) 10:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Heroesdx9 (talk) 10:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Heroesdx9 (talk) 11:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Heroesdx9 (talk) 11:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Module Test Mohammed Qays 🗣 14:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Alaa :)..! 15:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Copyvio, probably already deleted as File:Portrait de Ficht Tanner devant ses broderies en 2008.jpg Habertix (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; redeletion of previously deleted media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Je ne l'aimme plus BITAR Mahmoud (talk) 16:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Je ne l'aime plus BITAR Mahmoud (talk) 16:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as COM:DW (apparent screenshot of tv broadcast) (Uploader's nomination reason is nonsense.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
i mistakely upload this file Romeojuli1 (talk) 01:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:53, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:16, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 19:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
情報に誤りがあったため。 JEVEX1 (talk) 06:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Miss created. Not us redirect. 이강철 (talk) 08:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload, also empty file page. --Rosenzweig τ 18:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
uploaded twice mistakenly (File:X-Ray (1) 1965 stamps of Sharjah.jpg) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 11:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Not your own work. Futbollo (talk) 12:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 18:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Text and arrows are too small. I'm uploading a new version that is more readable. Pvanp7 (talk) 12:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
è la facciata sud, non la facciata est del Duomo Lallalina (talk) 12:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Wrong IPA symbols in bottom left-hand corner. Pvanp7 (talk) 12:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Shouldn't have any arrows. Pvanp7 (talk) 14:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:45, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Erreur d'écriture Tomfromfallbk (talk) 15:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Verbesserte Version eingestellt, bitte löschen Marcel601 (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:43, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I mistakenly submitted this photo to the Wiki Loves Earth contest. I would like to withdraw it and request deletion. Salahuddin Ahmed02 (talk) 15:50, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:43, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I mistakenly submitted this photo to the Wiki Loves Earth contest. I would like to withdraw it and request deletion. Salahuddin Ahmed02 (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I mistakenly submitted this photo to the Wiki Loves Earth contest. I would like to withdraw it and request deletion. Salahuddin Ahmed02 (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I mistakenly submitted this photo to the Wiki Loves Earth contest. I would like to withdraw it and request deletion. Salahuddin Ahmed02 (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I mistakenly submitted this photo to the Wiki Loves Earth contest. I would like to withdraw it and request deletion. Salahuddin Ahmed02 (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I mistakenly submitted this photo to the Wiki Loves Earth contest. I would like to withdraw it and request deletion. Salahuddin Ahmed02 (talk) 15:53, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I mistakenly submitted this photo to the Wiki Loves Earth contest. I would like to withdraw it and request deletion. Salahuddin Ahmed02 (talk) 15:53, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I mistakenly submitted this photo to the Wiki Loves Earth contest. I would like to withdraw it and request deletion. Salahuddin Ahmed02 (talk) 15:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:শাহ-বুলবুল (Terpsiphone paradisi), নওগাঁ–STT 2483.jpg ROCKY (talk) 16:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Moheen (keep talking) 18:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Duplicate of লালমাথা টিয়া (Psittacula cyanocephala), নওগাঁ, বাংলাদেশ.jpg ROCKY (talk) 16:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Moheen (keep talking) 18:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a host for personnal documents. gpesenti (talk) 13:19, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 19:32, 6 July 2025 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 20:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
SPEEDY لاسباب شخصية (= personal reasons) عراق بغداد (talk) 18:57, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Speedy delete uploader request after 5 days. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:56, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
uploaded this image then immediately noticed it had already been uploaded previously File:FEMA_403_NYC_Cooperative_Building_Damage_Assessment_Map_of_November_7,_2001.png Found5dollar (talk) 19:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom, dupe. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
| want to submit it in wiki earth 2025 Momen5252 (talk) 21:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:16, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake SimonATL (talk) 22:20, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:16, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Solicitud del propio usuario — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacasadeljotta (talk • contribs) 20:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:57, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Solicitud del propio usuario — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacasadeljotta (talk • contribs) 20:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:56, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Solicitud del propio usuario — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacasadeljotta (talk • contribs) 20:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:45, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Solicitud del propio usuario creador — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacasadeljotta (talk • contribs) 20:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:45, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Solicitud del propio usuario creador — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacasadeljotta (talk • contribs) 20:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Solicitud del propio usuario creador — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacasadeljotta (talk • contribs) 20:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Solicitud del propio usuario creador — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacasadeljotta (talk • contribs) 20:12, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:45, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Solicitud del propio usuario creador — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacasadeljotta (talk • contribs) 20:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Solicitud del propio usuario creador — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacasadeljotta (talk • contribs) 20:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Odhiambogeorge2050 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:28, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 00:22, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of scope: AI-generated image of a museum, bearing no relationship to the actual appearance or contents of the museum. Omphalographer (talk) 23:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ehaberia Kingdom (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Personal fiction. Currently these files are still in-use in drafted articles in en-WP and ar-WP; but those should be deleted soon-ish.
- File:Kingdom of Ehaberia National Anthem.ogg
- File:Flag of the Kingdom of Ehaberia.png
- File:The Passport of Ehaberia Kingdom.png
- File:The Emblem of the kingdom of Ehaberia.png
Enyavar (talk) 12:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Delete per nom, lacking COM:EDUSE. --Achim55 (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Blunt advertisements 109.71.220.186 12:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Blunt advertisements 109.71.220.186 12:37, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:04, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:43, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:04, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:04, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:04, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:05, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:05, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Амиран Первый (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction
Enyavar (talk) 12:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:05, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:05, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:06, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:06, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:06, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 12:57, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:06, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yong Zhong Jun (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 12:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:06, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:00, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) - it doesn't help that a flag-generator is linked as the source Enyavar (talk) 17:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:01, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:12, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
File:2025-03-12 10 41 15 Mural at the Millville Army Air Field Museum at Millville Executive Airport in Millville, Cumberland County, New Jersey.jpg
[edit]No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Way too complex for {{PD-simple}}. Needs another free license or to be deleted. Jonteemil (talk) 00:23, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- If File:Logo of the European Commission (2025, English, horizontal).svg is below the threshold of originality, so is this. ⇒ Aerrapc they/them, 00:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Huh? They literally have nothing in common? Jonteemil (talk) 00:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- That file is just as, if not slightly more, complex. ⇒ Aerrapc they/them, 01:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree strongly. Jonteemil (talk) 07:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- That file is just as, if not slightly more, complex. ⇒ Aerrapc they/them, 01:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Huh? They literally have nothing in common? Jonteemil (talk) 00:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Too complex for {{PD-simple}}. Needs another free license or to be deleted.
Jonteemil (talk) 00:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Infringement of sculptural copyright. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. This undated (but likely post-1970s) monument was authored by sculptor Cesar Gumba. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 03:01, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Added 
Info Cesar Gumba is apparently still alive, at least as of 2025, which makes this monument a likely post-1970s creation and still under his copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 03:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:57, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Same case of sculptural copyright infringement as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sarikaw statue 01.JPG. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 03:02, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:57, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Same case of sculptural copyright infringement as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sarikaw statue 01.JPG. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 03:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:57, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mossallem88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
self promotional logos, unused and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Not own work, it's false logo. 120.188.78.212 05:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete It is possibly out of scope there (see COM:SCOPE). 2404:8000:1037:587:A4C3:6666:791F:A890 09:53, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside user sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheOfficialYungStar (talk · contribs)
[edit]self promotional logos, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Appears to be a work of fiction. Omphalographer (talk) 02:59, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
This AI image is used in a lot of wiki pages of German Philosopher Max Stirner, but doesn't represent him adequately NomadeSpontex (talk) 10:33, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it needs to be removed. Even on Stirner's French page, this photo is present with the mention "Max Stirner sketches by Friedrich Engels", when this obviously refers to the sketch that was on the previous page, and which is still visible on the English page btw. EtimmT (talk) 11:37, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- While, yes, this is misleading, but shouldn't it be better to remove the image from all Wiki articles and not delete it? Crispybeatle (talk) 16:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Absolute nonsense having an image AI-generated picture on Commons with this title. This is NOT Max Stirner RSVartanian (talk) 22:50, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Belbury as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Explicitly asking an AI to "Create a similar picture without any copyright violation" of a specific copyrighted source image is still a copyright violation (COM:DERIV)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion due to the fundamental significance of this rationale. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete for explicitly being a COM:DERIV based on a single input reference image. That the AI was asked to create it "without any copyright violation" doesn't mean that it understood what that was asking, or that it managed to do so.
- Also flagging File:Dippel als Alchemist.jpg for discussion - it has an unrelated prompt of
Take the File:PPN663959063 Christianus Democritus.jpg and draw Dippel as an alchemist in his workshop in the style of a horror comic
but somehow has the same pose, props, costume and "a notorious alchemist sought the secret of eternal life" caption as the file listed above, perhaps because it was generated as part of the same AI conversation. Belbury (talk) 12:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)- This addresses the copyright status of two images depicting the historical figure Johann Konrad Dippel, a German alchemist often associated with the search for immortality.
- The original image is a traditional comic book illustration, originating from a vintage, copyright-protected publication. It portrays Dippel in a cluttered laboratory, dramatically mixing chemicals over bubbling beakers. The style is consistent with American superhero comics of the 1970s or 1980s—featuring thick inking, vivid colors, dynamic postures, and a narrative caption.
- The new picture „File:Dippel als Alchemist“ by contrast, is a newly generated drawing created using DALL·E (OpenAI’s image generation model). It was produced based on the prompt:
- “Draw Dippel as an alchemist in his workshop in the style of a horror comic,”
- and used a public domain portrait of Dippel as visual reference. The resulting image shows a dramatically lit, etching-style depiction of Dippel holding a flask over a flaming cauldron in a sparse, almost medieval laboratory.
- From a copyright law perspective—especially under U.S., German, and international standards (Berne Convention)—there is a critical distinction between an idea and its expression.
- The general idea of “a historical alchemist working in a lab, seeking eternal life” is not protected by copyright. What copyright law protects is a particular expression of that idea: the specific drawing style, arrangement of elements, poses, and execution.
- The new image does not copy the protected expression of the comic. It differs in all key aspects:
- • Artistic style (vintage horror comic vs. superhero comic),
- • Color palette (earth tones and chiaroscuro vs. bright saturated colors),
- • Composition and atmosphere,
- • Poses, gestures, and narrative framing.
- There is no substantial similarity in the protectable elements. The new image was not derived from the earlier comic panel, and does not recreate any visual details of the original. Fifat (talk) 00:14, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Fifat, thanks for disclosing the prompt.--Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- You say the second image "used a public domain portrait of Dippel as visual reference" and you only asked it to draw a horror comic, but it is clearly still also using the same Marvel comic panel for reference. It has the same pose, clothing, props (minus the clamp and skeleton), rafters background and "notorious alchemist" comic caption, which don't appear in the public domain portrait.
- I think the chatbot has implicitly assumed that you still want it to generate a copyright-free version of the copyrighted Marvel panel that you mentioned earlier in the same conversation. Belbury (talk) 09:58, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Keep Not similar enough, and not a copyrighted character. Cambalachero (talk) 13:59, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete File:Konrad Dippel as inspiration for Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.jpg. This image is very clearly derivative of the Marvel depiction of Dippel - not only is the image stylistically similar, but it mimics the Marvel composition quite closely - Dippel has grey wavy hair, some sort of white cloth at his neck, and a yellow coat; there is a skeleton to the left of him, and a blueish metal ring stand at the right; there is a sequence of pink, red, and yellow flasks at the bottom ofthe image. All of these are creative choices which were made by the Marvel artist which the image model has slavishly copied; the instruction to "avoid any copyright infringement" has clearly fallen on deaf (metal) ears. Delete File:Dippel als Alchemist.jpg as well. Here the similarity to the Marvel comic is weaker, but it's still there; Dippel is still in essentially the same pose (looking to the right, holding a flask in his left hand over a chemical apparatus) and is clothed similarly (his coat has changed from yellow to a dark color, but his attire is otherwise similar). And a general
.svg/20px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png)
Comment: The overall notion of representing Dippel as a comic book character is not copyrightable, but these images are all drawing inspiration from the Marvel strip you provided as reference, whether you specified that in the specific request or not. To break that connection, you need to start a new session with your AI model in which you do not mention the original strip or Marvel Comics at all. Instructing the AI model to "create a picture [...] without any copyright violation" is not effective; any information you have provided to the model will affect its output in ways which may infringe on copyright. Omphalographer (talk) 16:47, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: we'd consider that a derivative work if done by a human; being done by an AI doesn't change that. - Jmabel ! talk 20:14, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Regardless of the copyright status, these images are unused, have no educational value, and are actively misleading. We have actual engravings of Dippel to use. Throw File:Dippel versucht seine Frau wieder zum Leben zu erwecken.jpg in there too. Apocheir (talk) 22:40, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Agree, the file is out of scope. Riad Salih (talk) 22:59, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- There are definitely ongoing echoes of the original image in that new version, with Dippel still holding a flask of yellow liquid above the yellow flames/smoke of a cauldron on a wooden bench, and still wearing the same clothes. If I give DALL-E the same text prompt, I get back a dark-haired man in a dark jacket crouched over a pentagram on the floor, with a speech bubble. Belbury (talk) 08:14, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The watermark casts doubt that the User is the copyright holder Nv8200pa (talk) 11:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
unused poor quality image of unidentified location Ske (talk) 11:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Source Instagram missjulielavie 2A00:20:C293:7367:FFA9:F105:DFF3:DA80 12:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Source Instagram missjulielavie 2A00:20:C293:7367:FFA9:F105:DFF3:DA80 12:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The copyright holder in the exif metadata cannot be linked to the user. Nv8200pa (talk) 12:12, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The author in the exif metadata cannot be linked to the user. Nv8200pa (talk) 12:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:01, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The author in the exif metadata cannot be linked to the user. Nv8200pa (talk) 12:15, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:01, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The copyright holder in the exif metadata cannot be linked to the user. Nv8200pa (talk) 12:15, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:01, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Photographed by Christian Duval, lacks evidence for release under CC HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 13:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Delete The source indicated is "Hiago Kin's Channel". Presumably, this is the subject's YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/@HiagoKin). I can find no evidence at that channel that the videos there are available under the here stipulated cc-by-4.0, nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 13:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:03, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Not own work Janhrach (talk) 13:23, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:11, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Above-de minimis copyrighted content. Janhrach (talk) 13:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:04, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Needs permission unless below TOO. Jonteemil (talk) 14:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. No exif. Permission needed. Jonteemil (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Screenshot Nv8200pa (talk) 14:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Needs permission unless below TOO. Jonteemil (talk) 14:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:07, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Possibly above COM:TOO Panama which is unknown. Jonteemil (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:07, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
COM:DW HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:08, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
COM:DW HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:08, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
COM:DW HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:08, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Disc cover : https://www.discogs.com/release/5209174-T%C3%B6bi-Tobler-Ficht-Tanner-Appenzeller-Space-Sch%C3%B6ttl Habertix (talk) 15:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:09, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Work by de:Rudolf Mumprecht - non free Habertix (talk) 16:20, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:10, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 18:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 18:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Heavily duplicates Thames 18 2012-07-08.jpg and covered by many other images (18 is basically 19) Adam37 (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep, File:Thames 18 2012-07-08.jpg is way different than the nominated file, as they appears to be taken in different angles. Tvpuppy (talk) 19:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: Per Tvpuppy. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:41, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Not pedagogical nor illustrative Noé (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:39, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated images of VR headsets. We have plenty of real images of these, as well as another image from this set which is in use (File:VR-AR-XR Headset 2.jpg).
- File:Futuristic VR-AR-XR Headset.jpg
- File:Stylish VR-AR-XR Headset.jpg
- File:VR-AR-XR Headset.jpg
- File:VR-AR-XR Headset 3.jpg
- File:VR-AR-XR Headset 4.jpg
- File:VR-AR-XR Headset 5.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 21:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:39, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
That is no selfie, potential copyright vio [1] Elfabso (talk) 21:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:37, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Badassfard21 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: alternate history maps, etc.
- File:Americaalthistory.png
- File:Teddylaniamap.png
- File:Coat of Arms of Teddylania.png
- File:Flag Of Teddylania.png
Omphalographer (talk) 20:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Badassfard21 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: additional alt-history maps.
Omphalographer (talk) 04:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Consensus seems to be that these fall under CSD F10, so I'm going to apply that to 'uploader's personal fiction' DRs until someone tells me to stop. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:39, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Badassfard21 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Personal fiction
- File:My Siberia map for my alt history.png
- File:My big mongolia map.png
- File:Islamic Rus Flag (Alternate History).png
- File:Anglo-Saxon Australia.png
Enyavar (talk) 22:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:36, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 22:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:37, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Mapa obsoleta — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2806:2f0:9101:8232:2d4d:9f76:acb2:ff7d (talk) 18:01, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Speedy keep, we don't delete obsolete maps, we use them to document history. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:30, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
File:November 1944 Ritterkreuzverleihungszeremonie durch Hubert Meyer an Arnold Jürgensen, Georg Hurdelbrink und Rudolf Roy.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Denniss as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: taken from unknown website with unknown author. Changing to normal deletion request, because this is a old picture. The uploader should provide a link to their source. A quick web search revealed no possible authorship. It could be kept by changing the license to {{PD-anon}} and {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 04:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Image may be old but its not old enough that the creator may be dead for 70+ years. Using the suggested "license" tags requires the uploader to make a reasonable search for an author. Uploader is not know for this as he previously uploaded several other images of the depicted person from third parties and had them deleted. COM:PCP applies here. --Denniss (talk) 09:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- "The copyright of this image has expired in the European Union because it was published more than 70 years ago without a public claim of authorship (anonymous or pseudonymous), and no subsequent claim of authorship was made in the 70 years following its first publication.
- To use this template, the image must meet both of the following two conditions:
- 1. Published over 70 years ago, and
- 2. The original author's actual identity was not publicly disclosed in connection with this image within 70 years following its publication."
- "Using the suggested "license" tags requires the uploader to make a reasonable search for an author."
- Yes, a thorough search was done for authors and there was no official publication that produced this image in books or media.
- "Uploader is not know for this "
- Please don't make unreasonable and unwarranted assumptions about someone. Knight De Roy (talk) 20:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: The only source we're given here is "website". Without a proper source for the first publication, we cannot at all determine the copyright status of this photo and if the author is actually anonymous or undisclosed as claimed. Also, a 1944 photo would most likely still be protected in the US because of the URAA. The file can be restored in 2065 with PD-old-assumed. --Rosenzweig τ 13:52, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Low quality, out of scope. Jonteemil (talk) 00:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Fine picture of an empty bar. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ChemSim (talk) 16:11, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
File:Jacob Cornelisz Schout - detail of The Banquet of the Officers of the St George Militia Company in 1616 by Frans Hals.jpg
[edit]very bad quality, very bad resolution, better File:Frans hals, banchetto degli ufficiali della guardia civica di s. giorgio, 1616, 05.jpg Oursana (talk) 00:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Category:Missing legal information Unrelated6 (talk) 00:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Clearly not own work and missing permission. --ChemSim (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Copyrighted images, uploaded without permission Wiraphat Raksat (talk) 01:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Clearly not own work and missing permission. --ChemSim (talk) 16:18, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for 2d art, and there is now a consensus that graffiti does enjoy copyright protection (at least in the United States). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- This was previously part of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Boston, but I closed that in favor of specific files to avoid COM:TOO issues. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
File:On Boston University Bridge facade next to Dr Paul Dudley White Bike Path (53233246410).jpg
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for 2d art, and there is now a consensus that graffiti does enjoy copyright protection (at least in the United States). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- This was previously part of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Boston, but I closed that in favor of specific files to avoid COM:TOO issues. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:18, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
No such CC-BY license attached to YouTube video. Filmgoer (talk) 02:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Author delete: This was a goof on my part, thank you for catching it! I was going through this channel since there were numerous clips with people that didn't have images, and a good deal of those clips had the Creative Commons license (such as File:Fred Raskin.png). Sock (talk) 20:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:53, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
File:2025.04.14. Funeral of Witold Kaczanowski at the Powazki Cemetery in Warsaw Poland Photo Mariusz Kubik 04.JPG
[edit]Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:18, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
File:2025.04.14. Funeral of Witold Kaczanowski at the Powazki Cemetery in Warsaw Poland Photo Mariusz Kubik 03.JPG
[edit]Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:19, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
File:2025.04.14. Funeral of Witold Kaczanowski at the Powazki Cemetery in Warsaw Poland Photo Mariusz Kubik 01.JPG
[edit]Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:19, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
This image is freely licensed as CC BY SA 2.0 but it is not the flickr account owner's work. It is a picture of a picture and only the designer of the image is the copyright owner just like these other two images from the flickr account here and here Leoboudv (talk) 02:56, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, flickrwashing. --ChemSim (talk) 16:20, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; substantial commercial COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation Please check out the cropped version, I don't think DW still applies. Darwin Ahoy! 11:11, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Copyrightable elements cropped out, what remains there is not recognizable. Of obvious educational value for depicting homelessness in Berlin. Darwin Ahoy! 11:10, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: as we now have a cropped version. --ChemSim (talk) 16:20, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. A biography. Omphalographer (talk) 03:01, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, many potential DW issues in the book. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
I don't want this Sachindu Nawanjana (talk) 03:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. In use, but looks suspiciously like unfree stock photo. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:56, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per IronGargoyle. --ChemSim (talk) 16:21, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Author is Tenzin Jamphel per Metadata, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. We would need explicit permission via COM:VRT to keep this file. --ChemSim (talk) 16:22, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Own work doubtful. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:18, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:22, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
File:100 jahre Telefon in der Schweiz 1880-1980. Helmaus Zürich. Jubilaüms Ausstellung 2. Oktober-23 November 1980. affiche.jpg
[edit]Copyright violation, created in 1980, no public domain. See also remark in source: "Droits: Reproduction réservée à un usage strictement privé." Tekstman (talk) 07:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
The only left uploader's contribution after deletion of blatant copyvio. Probably not own work as well. Quick1984 (talk) 08:00, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:00, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused low-quality photo of a camel - the photo is taken at a strange angle, and is rather noisy. Omphalographer (talk) 23:37, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:24, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 16:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Kephir is just now coming off a three-month ban, which was due to his complete and utter unwillingness or inability to modify his behavior in any way in response to the various issues, objections, and concerns that were raised by others -- instead always going full-speed ahead doing yet again exactly and precisely what many had objected to so often. (He received plenty of notice -- the three-month ban was preceded by a one-week ban, and voluminous discussion on the Commons "User problems" noticeboard, leaving aside his user talk page.) I think that in light of all the past history, this current action by User:Kephir doesn't show any degree of "good faith" on his part, and I would strongly recommend that at an absolute minimum, User:Kephir be topic-banned from the "special or fictional flags" area until there's some evidence that he is able to work with others on Commons without stirring up unnecessary friction and turbulence (as opposed to refusing to modify his behavior in the slightest degree, which would seem to betray a certain spiteful and malicious motivation at this point). [Non-admin closure.] AnonMoos (talk) 12:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:37, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- please note, I notified AnonMoos, too. His closure was on procedural grounds and not based on the (non-)merits of the file. --Enyavar (talk) 17:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. I can't find any evidence this was ever used. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 21:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:53, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. --ChemSim (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. --ChemSim (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. --ChemSim (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:46, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vietminh1908 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 17:33, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 17:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) - reupload after previous deletion Enyavar (talk) 17:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
I fought I was ready to share my picture, but I'm not Could you please delete it. Josh Gavin (talk) 17:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete You cannot rescind your license 1 year after an upload, but it is out-of-focus, and you provided others that are in focus. --RAN (talk) 18:20, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 17:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. --ChemSim (talk) 16:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:40, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:39, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 17:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:39, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Der Fokus des Bildes liegt nicht auf der Kirche sondern auf der Person im Vordergrund. RIL91 (talk) 17:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 17:53, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) - this is a fanfiction extension of Molossia lore: the flag of a supposed (non-existent) rival neighbor nation that declared war against the Molossians. The war lasted for 20 days during which 3 mock-soldiers fought bravely against THIN AIR.
This is a bit much. Enyavar (talk) 18:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. --ChemSim (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Je ne l'aimme plus BITAR Mahmoud (talk) 18:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:37, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 18:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. --ChemSim (talk) 16:36, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 18:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:35, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Obviously no own photo from 2023, used here allready in 2019, copyvio. Druschba 4 (talk) 18:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:35, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, unidentified physics diagram. Omphalographer (talk) 18:15, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:34, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
redundant PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 19:37, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ChemSim (talk) 16:32, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
redundant PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @PequodOnStationAtLZ: redundant to what?
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ChemSim (talk) 16:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
composite of at least one stock pic, likely more, dubious as to whether that is cc https://tineye.com/search/1a18918befa327c71b9a136962361fe1532a0ea3?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also out of COM:SCOPE. --ChemSim (talk) 16:28, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Dario Acosta - would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:27, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Dario Acosta - would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:27, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Mala calidad (bad quality) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2806:2f0:9101:8232:2d4d:9f76:acb2:ff7d (talk) 18:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:25, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Bad quality of an old sign — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2806:2f0:9101:8232:2d4d:9f76:acb2:ff7d (talk) 18:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 16:25, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 08:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:04, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 08:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 08:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Not under fair use and is not my work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tokeamour (talk • contribs) 02:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Delete per nom. From https://oneshiponefight.com/Resources/Awards (specifically, this is the "Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Naval Sea Cadet Medal" ribbon pictured on the right side of this picture). Now, that site's footer states "Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved." A real US Navy or Coast Guard site would not say that. oneshiponefight.com is not registered to the US Navy or the US Coast Guard, and does not use the .mil TLD. I can't get https://oneshiponefight.com/Contact to respond due to "504 Gateway Time-out", but it was archived to http://web.archive.org/web/20250423162700/https://oneshiponefight.com/Contact back in April, showing no actual contact info. Most probably not produced by an employee of the US federal government while working. Copyright violation & G7 per uploader in Special:Diff/1052888316. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:09, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Goldenstar imperial (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 14:59, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Goldenstar imperial (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:21, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Needs permission unless below TOO. Jonteemil (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:21, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:21, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Needs proof of permission if not deemed below TOO. Jonteemil (talk) 15:01, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:21, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Je ne l'aime plus BITAR Mahmoud (talk) 16:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Je ne l'aimme plus BITAR Mahmoud (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Supprimer BITAR Mahmoud (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
ce fichier doit être supprimer car il fait objet d'une publication involontaire dans un contexte déplacé BITAR Mahmoud (talk) 17:18, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Je veux le supprimer BITAR Mahmoud (talk) 17:56, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, likely unfree. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Perhaps above COM:TOO Italy? A09 (talk) 18:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Logotip društva Stu ledi sem našel prosto dostopen na spletu ... Sivimedved (talk) 09:17, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:14, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Republic of Sanetta Nuova (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
- File:Flag of the Republic of Sanetta Nuova Square Version.jpg
- File:Coat of arms of the Republic of Sanetta Nuova.jpg
- File:Sanetta Nuova Physical Map.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 14:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:14, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 14:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:15, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 14:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:15, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 14:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrey Von Trotskygrad (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
- File:Presidential Seal.png
- File:Personal coat of arms, example for didactic purposes in heraldry.png
- File:Alternative version of the coat of arms of the Holy Roman Empire.png
- File:Royal Seal of Germanic decrees.png
Enyavar (talk) 14:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:17, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Heavytank1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) While these examples are not unpleasant to look at, there is no source/link to provide credibility
Enyavar (talk) 14:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:17, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:18, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
- File:Flag of the Republic of Sanetta Nuova 189x125.png
- File:Flag of the Republic of Sanetta Nuova.svg
- File:Flag of the Republic of Sanetta Nuova.png
Enyavar (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:18, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sutdrengen (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:18, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Conpo Pyonghwo (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 14:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:19, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HypeFox Productions (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 14:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:19, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 14:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:19, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 15:23, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 15:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
uploader is not photograph / picture is copyrighted by Maison Moderne editor op Paperjam Puscas (talk) 15:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:21, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete duplicate of file:Flag of Bandiaterra.png REAL 💬 ⬆ 18:16, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
_1965_stamps_of_Sharjah.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1965_stamps_of_Sharjah.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_1965_stamps_of_Sharjah.jpg){kind=link}
_1965_stamps_of_Sharjah.jpg){kind=link}
_del_Duomo_di_San_Corrado.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_del_Duomo_di_San_Corrado.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_del_Duomo_di_San_Corrado.jpg){kind=link}
_del_Duomo_di_San_Corrado.jpg){kind=link}
,_নওগাঁ–STT_2483.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg){kind=link}
_At_Camden_Lock_Market_-_London.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_07.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_07.jpg){kind=link}
_07.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_Flag_of_Mount_Henadas.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Flag_of_Mount_Henadas.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Flag_of_Mount_Henadas.jpg){kind=link}
_Flag_of_Mount_Henadas.jpg){kind=link}
_(17905220914).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17905220914).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(17905220914).jpg){kind=link}
_(17905220914).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:21, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
{{Fake SVG}} and out of COM:SCOPE. We already have File:Blyth Academy Logo.svg as correct version. ChemSim (talk) 18:56, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ChemSim (talk) 13:41, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Not own work. Janhrach (talk) 13:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Janhrach (talk) 13:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PeteMama69420 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) In case of Alwar, which is not claimed by uploader to be a micronation: No sources or links to this supposed nation were provided.
- File:Flag of Alwar (1750-1931).gif
- File:Flag of the Atheist State of the Aarianian Territories (former micronation).jpg
- File:Flag of the Kingdom of Aariania (micronation).jpg
- File:Flag of the Aarianian Empire (micronation 2011-2012).jpg
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Enyavar (talk) 13:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:100 drachma.png. Janhrach (talk) 13:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:100 drachma.png. Janhrach (talk) 13:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reino de Wenmar (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 13:33, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:39, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:23, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 13:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Agree. Those fictional country flags without any sources are just crazy and should be DELETED. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 21:37, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:45, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Hoax or joke, there is no Republic of Sovyanka, see en:User:Giyzlelog/sandbox.
Achim55 (talk) 08:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also tagged the draft for deletion. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Media related to a non-notable micronation (pretty much all I could find online is https://www.nationstates.net/nation=prekrasna_gorod); no educational value.
- File:COA Prekrasna Gorod.png
- File:Prek.Gor. Map.png
- File:Prekrasna Gorod Flag.png
- File:Coat of arms Prek.Gor..png
- File:Presidential St. Prek. Gor..png
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 13:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: high-velocity image out of a car window, features unrecognizable Enyavar (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
not "own work" - satellite photo from unspecified provider Enyavar (talk) 14:02, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 14:02, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josscelio ximenes (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: blurry or private images, watermarked and unused
- File:Composição Étnica de Alcântaras.png
- File:Uma típica alcantarense.jpg
- File:Saída de Alcântaras para Meruoca.png
- File:Cidade de Alcântaras, Ceará.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 14:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lee Sim-woo (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
- File:Flag of the Dominican Empire (micronation).png
- File:Coat of arms of the Dominican Empire (micronation).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Enyavar (talk) 14:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AdmiralGeneralAladeen1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Enyavar (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Also, the first one is a duplicate of File:Flag of Palau.svg. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 21:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UnalToprakDalcan (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 14:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:28, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 14:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:28, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 14:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:28, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:28, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:29, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Unused low quality file that adds nothing educationally distinct from better quality images. Nv8200pa (talk) 11:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:24, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marita Devore (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvio. One is a photograph for Ouest-France (not freely-licensed) and the own work claim for the other is unsubstantiated as it lacks metadata and proper size.
- File:Farnaz Abdoli, November 2024, Parsi- France, Photo taken by Marc Olivier, Quest France.jpg
- File:Photo Farnaz Abdoli-2023.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:23, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Victor Jacint (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 13:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:23, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- The Noto Sans font and how it's done makes it look FANMADE and was probably created using Scratch. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 13:46, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:12, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files in Category:Real Pilar logos
[edit]Above COM:TOO Argentina.
Jonteemil (talk) 14:56, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by InternationalUkraine (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
- File:Неофіційний прапор Дакії.png
- File:Прапор Королівства Соййоріс та Республіки Соййоріс.png
- File:Герб Князівства Соййоріс.png
- File:Прапор Князівства Соййоріс.png
Enyavar (talk) 16:19, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:28, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Non free logo : https://www.ausbildung-weiterbildung.ch/Detail.aspx?schoolID=3684 Habertix (talk) 18:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Simple logo clearly under {{PD-textlogo}}. I have adapted the license accordingly. ChemSim (talk) 16:33, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: Per ChemSim. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:32, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
False accusations of antisemitism
[edit]- File:Holocaust Good Article review excerpt Feb 2 2013.png
- File:Editing out the anti-Jewish critique of an NGO per Oboler et al 2010.png
File:Serial erasure of content in a Jewish history article by a user engaging in tendentious editing.jpg
Deleted
See enwiki and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jewish well poisoning allegation source insertion.png and simple. Sev6nWiki (talk) 08:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#False_accusations_of_antisemitism. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 09:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep on the first two. There were Wikipedia diffs mentioned in academic papers. Those academic papers along with those diffs are mentioned in a Wikipedia article. Someone screenshotted the diffs and uploaded them to Commons. Seems straightforward COM:SCOPE to me. Even if they're removed from the article, it seems like a fine thing to do to illustrate diffs from papers about Wikipedia. I also don't see anything being called "antisemitic" on the file pages, but if I've missed something anyone can just go edit the captions/descriptions. It looks like there's something else going on with the other uploader, though, from looking at that other DR. Looks like those diffs have nothing to do with any paper, and are just one Wikipedian upset at a diff, so screenshotting it, framing it as "antisemitic" (in the case of the other DR) or "tendentious" (in the case of the third nom here). That they were blocked for harassment makes me think we should Delete the third and the one from the other nomination. I'm not involved in the underlying dispute, so it's possible I have something wrong here. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites The first two were added to:
- and en:Antisemitism on Wikipedia which is a massive BLP violation. They serve no purpose other than to falsely accuse Wikipedians. Polygnotus (talk) 17:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- But that doesn't reply to what I said? Those are diffs not pulled out of thin air to attack someone but diffs described in academic papers about Wikipedia, extracted -- it seems to me -- to illustrate those diffs on Wikipedia. That's a long way from "falsely accusing Wikipedians" except insofar as you want to challenge those journal articles. The descriptions/captions do not appear to name anyone or call anything antisemitic. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- You appear to be unwilling to click the links. If you want to understand the context, you gotta click the links and read the context provided. Polygnotus (talk) 22:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- I've clicked, and don't love this "You appear to be unwilling" stuff. If I'm wrong -- if ProfGray's uploads are not just screenshots of edits that are mentioned by academic papers and referenced in the enwiki article, please correct me. That's the SCOPE argument satisfied to me. If those two images are part of a harassment campaign sufficient to get over the SCOPE arguments, that's something that needs to be articulated very clearly, and isn't usually something we deal with at DR (as opposed to e.g. ANU). — Rhododendrites talk | 22:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites If you clicked the links and read the text, then you know they are "not just screenshots of edits that are mentioned by academic papers".
If those two images are part of a harassment campaign
Again, if you clicked the links and read the text you already knew that. Especially in this context. - And since the first 2 screenshots are unused and cannot be used, there is no reason to !vote against deletion except contrarianism. Polygnotus (talk) 22:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- That diff is about the academic paper itself... an academic paper in JITP, which is a well respected peer-reviewed journal. I'm not getting involved in whether it should be cited in the article, but that an edit is mentioned in a high-quality journal which at least for the time being is mentioned in a Wikipedia article, satisfies COM:SCOPE as far as I'm concerned. Beyond that, the burden would be on you to show there is another solid reason to delete (i.e. that it is part of a harassment campaign). You have not adequately made your case that these two (those uploaded by ProfGray -- I'm satisfied that the one's uploaded by Steven1991 are problematic, as I said here and in the other DR) are part of a harassment campaign, but rather gestured to multiple walls of text and act as though it should be self-evident, blaming me for not combing through them to make sense of your own argument. After being pinged to the enwiki discussion and seeing your comments here, I am not interested to engage in this battleground further. — Rhododendrites talk | 23:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites if you are not interested in engaging in a battleground, it may be wise to not post a comment. I can't repeat everything for everyone who is too lazy to actually read the walls of text that were already posted.
You have not adequately made your case
I have, but you seem to be unwilling to read it, as you have admitted yourself. Polygnotus (talk) 23:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites if you are not interested in engaging in a battleground, it may be wise to not post a comment. I can't repeat everything for everyone who is too lazy to actually read the walls of text that were already posted.
- That diff is about the academic paper itself... an academic paper in JITP, which is a well respected peer-reviewed journal. I'm not getting involved in whether it should be cited in the article, but that an edit is mentioned in a high-quality journal which at least for the time being is mentioned in a Wikipedia article, satisfies COM:SCOPE as far as I'm concerned. Beyond that, the burden would be on you to show there is another solid reason to delete (i.e. that it is part of a harassment campaign). You have not adequately made your case that these two (those uploaded by ProfGray -- I'm satisfied that the one's uploaded by Steven1991 are problematic, as I said here and in the other DR) are part of a harassment campaign, but rather gestured to multiple walls of text and act as though it should be self-evident, blaming me for not combing through them to make sense of your own argument. After being pinged to the enwiki discussion and seeing your comments here, I am not interested to engage in this battleground further. — Rhododendrites talk | 23:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites If you clicked the links and read the text, then you know they are "not just screenshots of edits that are mentioned by academic papers".
- I've clicked, and don't love this "You appear to be unwilling" stuff. If I'm wrong -- if ProfGray's uploads are not just screenshots of edits that are mentioned by academic papers and referenced in the enwiki article, please correct me. That's the SCOPE argument satisfied to me. If those two images are part of a harassment campaign sufficient to get over the SCOPE arguments, that's something that needs to be articulated very clearly, and isn't usually something we deal with at DR (as opposed to e.g. ANU). — Rhododendrites talk | 22:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- You appear to be unwilling to click the links. If you want to understand the context, you gotta click the links and read the context provided. Polygnotus (talk) 22:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- But that doesn't reply to what I said? Those are diffs not pulled out of thin air to attack someone but diffs described in academic papers about Wikipedia, extracted -- it seems to me -- to illustrate those diffs on Wikipedia. That's a long way from "falsely accusing Wikipedians" except insofar as you want to challenge those journal articles. The descriptions/captions do not appear to name anyone or call anything antisemitic. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Rhododendrites, diffs being in academic papers don't mean shit if the screenshots are used as personal attacks. Need I remind you and those that voted keep per you that NPA is a policy on English Wikipedia, Simple English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons? LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 03:14, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- How were the first two used as personal attacks? Is the argument that if material in a peer-reviewed journal article cited in an article about [criticism of] Wikipedia casts Wikipedia editors in a negative light, including it (or illustrating it) is a personal attack? If so, that's a pretty tricky argument and I'd like to see it hashed out in general terms on enwiki. I mean, we're not talking about some Breitbart or 4chan nonsense, but Holocaust Studies and the Journal of Information Technology and Politics. HS is not my area at all, but I get the sense it's pretty reputable. JITP is an area I'm familiar with, and it's reputable (though I'll admit I have no idea if it had the same reputation in 2010). I understand that some folks are challenging the source's use on the basis of the authors, and I'm not trying to weigh in on that -- I'm just making the point that those journals don't feel like good cases for saying inclusion of material in citations is a violation of behavioral policies. I appreciate folks may disagree on that point. As before, if I'm missing a smoking gun that makes it obvious ProfGray meant to use these as a personal attack, I hope someone will link to it. — Rhododendrites talk | 03:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: I consider this addition of the image to be a personal attack. The caption is a significant misrepresentation of the actual edit, and it is in Wikipedia voice without any in-text attribution of the claim. Just because something appeared in a journal (and this image itself did not, only a link to the diff) does not mean it is above reproach, nor is it guaranteed to be in scope. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:45, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. Is it the specific language of the caption that you're saying is the personal attack, or including the image at all? If the former, it seems like an effort to summarize the journal article (which has three paragraphs on that user/subject). Is it the link to the diff perhaps? If it's the image itself, I don't see how that could be any more of a personal attack than citing the source, which after all is much more critical of the user -- it has a whole three-paragraph section about the user -- and it's the blurriness between those two things that makes me uneasy to call it a personal attack. Again, not weighing in on whether it's helpful in an article, just whether illustrating a diff already described in the Wikipedia article based on a citation to a journal article, is inherently a personal attack. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:36, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- You said you were gonna upload insect photos instead of being counterproductive here. Why do you ask these questions that you would already know the answers to if you had read the links provided? Can you please go upload insect pictures like you promised? There are over 900.000 known insect species. If you delete your comments here I might even come help you when this is done. Thank you. Polygnotus (talk) 17:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yikes. I think this is where you and I disengage. If anyone else would has a follow-up, I'm open to pings/messages. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:54, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- You said you were gonna upload insect photos instead of being counterproductive here. Why do you ask these questions that you would already know the answers to if you had read the links provided? Can you please go upload insect pictures like you promised? There are over 900.000 known insect species. If you delete your comments here I might even come help you when this is done. Thank you. Polygnotus (talk) 17:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. Is it the specific language of the caption that you're saying is the personal attack, or including the image at all? If the former, it seems like an effort to summarize the journal article (which has three paragraphs on that user/subject). Is it the link to the diff perhaps? If it's the image itself, I don't see how that could be any more of a personal attack than citing the source, which after all is much more critical of the user -- it has a whole three-paragraph section about the user -- and it's the blurriness between those two things that makes me uneasy to call it a personal attack. Again, not weighing in on whether it's helpful in an article, just whether illustrating a diff already described in the Wikipedia article based on a citation to a journal article, is inherently a personal attack. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:36, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: I consider this addition of the image to be a personal attack. The caption is a significant misrepresentation of the actual edit, and it is in Wikipedia voice without any in-text attribution of the claim. Just because something appeared in a journal (and this image itself did not, only a link to the diff) does not mean it is above reproach, nor is it guaranteed to be in scope. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:45, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- How were the first two used as personal attacks? Is the argument that if material in a peer-reviewed journal article cited in an article about [criticism of] Wikipedia casts Wikipedia editors in a negative light, including it (or illustrating it) is a personal attack? If so, that's a pretty tricky argument and I'd like to see it hashed out in general terms on enwiki. I mean, we're not talking about some Breitbart or 4chan nonsense, but Holocaust Studies and the Journal of Information Technology and Politics. HS is not my area at all, but I get the sense it's pretty reputable. JITP is an area I'm familiar with, and it's reputable (though I'll admit I have no idea if it had the same reputation in 2010). I understand that some folks are challenging the source's use on the basis of the authors, and I'm not trying to weigh in on that -- I'm just making the point that those journals don't feel like good cases for saying inclusion of material in citations is a violation of behavioral policies. I appreciate folks may disagree on that point. As before, if I'm missing a smoking gun that makes it obvious ProfGray meant to use these as a personal attack, I hope someone will link to it. — Rhododendrites talk | 03:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- and en:Antisemitism on Wikipedia which is a massive BLP violation. They serve no purpose other than to falsely accuse Wikipedians. Polygnotus (talk) 17:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete unused Wikipedia screenshots not illustrating a software feature are clearly out of scope. GPSLeo (talk) 14:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Per Rhododendrites. --RAN (talk) 18:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. The first two images were uploaded by me. They serve to illustrate (or display) evidence that is (or was) mentioned in the article as cited by scholars who have studied methods of anti-Jewish bias on Wikipedia. Thus, it is evidence cited in reliable sources.
- Note: Are you concerned that the images themselves are "accusations of antisemitism" -- I ask because that is not how they are presented by scholars IIRC -- and in what sense are they false? Do they mischaracterize the scholarship, or are you concerned that the scholarship is false?
- The third image is not by me. It looks like a screenshot of a recent, perhaps ongoing Wikipedia editing dispute. The screenshot does not represent evidence from any reliable secondary source.
- I'm inclined to agree with @Rhododendrites Keep above, though I'd like to better understand the alleged policy violation, for the first two images. Which aspect of WP:BLP or other deletion policy is at stake, with the first two images? Thanks. ProfGray (talk) 20:45, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @ProfGray You very much understand the policy violation, and it is disappointing that you act like this.
- You added the first to images to the article en:Antisemitism on Wikipedia which means you falsely accused people of antisemitism without a reliable source (as you say, the place where you got the images from do not present them that way).
- Rhododendrites does not understand the context, but you clearly do or should.
- You wrote
Thus, it is evidence cited in reliable sources.
and then you immediately contradict yourself by saying:Are you concerned that the images themselves are "accusations of antisemitism" -- I ask because that is not how they are presented by scholars IIRC
If the scholars did not present those images as proof of antisemitism, then how can it be evidence of antisemitism cited in a reliable source (not plural)? - @GreenLipstickLesbian, Zero0000, LilianaUwU, and Insanityclown1: Polygnotus (talk) 22:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polygnotus (talk • contribs) 22:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: The images and their use are also being challenged at the article Talk page.
- It seems inefficient to discuss these concerns in both places. Should I respond here? Or better to let the evidence and policies, etc., be discussed at the Talk page? 22:59, 6 July 2025 (UTC) ProfGray (talk) 22:59, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @ProfGray It seems inefficient to do anything other than apologize and move on, since those images cannot be used. Polygnotus (talk) 23:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy delete The Oboler paper (full text) that discusses the edits in the first two images was written by three authors associated with the right-wing NGO Monitor (former fellow, president, former intern). Given the association of its authors, I would not consider them to be a useful source about editorial bias. If for some reason there is a need to show screenshots of specific diffs to illustrate the Wikipedia article, we should not be using an obviously biased paper to choose those diffs, and there is no need to have screenshots of these diffs on Commons. Just being mentioned in a paper does not put them in scope.
- The authors do not mention that the diff in File:Editing out the anti-Jewish critique of an NGO per Oboler et al 2010.png adds a mention of NGO Monitor as the originator of a claim, which I find particularly dishonest. The description for this image uncritically repeats the claim from the paper, and was used in enwiki for the same purpose. It's clear that the uploader intended these to push a POV, and possibly attack the editor who made the diffs, rather than as a neutral illustration of the claims made in the paper.
- The screenshot uploaded by Steven1991 was for harassment and has zero value. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- As I said on AN... Speedy delete and OS them. It's insane that someone thought this was anything but an horrible idea. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 01:05, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete I have a feeling that the underlying purpose of these files is to publicly humiliate and encourage harassment on the involved contributors, I don't see why someone would upload this to Commons when an edit log is available on enwiki and simple. Sev6nWiki (talk) 10:04, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed, I noticed that the diff #2 added attribution of the claim (while defanging it). It's not clear why we would waste space with visual representations of information that can be linked to just as efficiently (except that adding it to commons allows for the addition of a filename orienting the viewer's experience of the diff). I was unaware that the academic article was also associated with the same NGO. As for the first image, I don't see the point in preserving and further spreading such nonsense from 12 years ago... SashiRolls (talk) 01:09, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, clear abuse of Commons to further accusations and debates on other wikis. The text shown in the first one is without doubt objectionable, but if it is relevant to an article it can be quoted with context. The uploader of the third one has been indeffed on en.wiki. Zero0000 (talk) 05:10, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep as per Rhododendrites (and potentially delete the third one that may not be sourced adequately to the article) Andre🚐 02:38, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Pi.1415926535 elucidates my thinking here. The 'academic sourcing' here doesn't pass general reliability, and this is clearly an attempt to defame editors contrary to Wikimedia norms (we can't control the standards of other publications, we can absolutely control how we express them here.) David Fuchs (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- As someone who doesn't appear to be already involved in the underlying dispute and someone whose judgment I think is good in general, I'm curious what you're seeing that backs up
clearly an attempt to defame
? When this popped up on COM:AN, I looked and saw two double-blind peer reviewed journal articles published in reputable journals (not the sort I'd put scare quotes around), which were -- and still appear to be -- cited in a Wikipedia article about Wikipedia, explicitly mentioning diffs that are likewise mentioned in the Wikipedia article, and someone creating an image based on that diff for display in that Wikipedia article. Unlike the files uploaded by Steven1991, there doesn't appear to be name-calling or spin put on the description, beyond how they were described in the journal articles. If the authorship of the articles makes them unfit for inclusion in the article (something which, based on their persistence in the article, I presume has not been sorted out yet), then there's room to disagree on COM:SCOPE grounds, and I won't lose sleep over a SCOPE-based deletion here. But in either case I'm really struggling to see how material from a cited journal article could possibly be NPA territory, nevermind defamation. I appreciate that the relationship between external sources and Wikipedia editors is complicated, and that there are powerful people actively trying to censor or chill speech by harassing/threatening our editors, but just lifting something from a journal article? Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:32, 7 July 2025 (UTC)- I agree with Pi that the papers' authors are clearly not unbiased sources. That's fine in the context of cultivating neutral POV and due weight in an article (I don't see anyone arguing they should be called out-and-out unreliable and removed), but it's unacceptable to use their illustrations to essentially argue their POV is the correct one. Beyond that it's also a simple editorial point—why are these edits being illustrated versus using summary style? Quotes should always be minimal. The pattern of intent is clear and at odds with our NPOV and harassment policies across WMF projects. The project loses nothing losing these images. David Fuchs (talk) 12:50, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- As someone who doesn't appear to be already involved in the underlying dispute and someone whose judgment I think is good in general, I'm curious what you're seeing that backs up
- Delete per GPSLeo and others. Yann (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep #1 and #2, Delete #3. #1 and #2 are in-scope as long as they are being used, and whether they are being used appropriately is not an editorial decision that Commons should make for Enwiki; I agree with Rhododendrites that this is not an obvious case. We can return to deleting these if consensus develops over there to exclude these images. #3 is obviously just being used for harassment, and the uploader ought to be banned here and globally blocked for cross-wiki harassment. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Compassionate727: where are you saying #1 and #2 are currently being used? - Jmabel ! talk 01:33, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Well, they were being used at en:Antisemitism on Wikipedia. I think discussion at en:Talk:Antisemitism on Wikipedia over whether they are appropriate is still ongoing. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:40, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- It is not. There is no article on Wikipedia on which these images are appropriate. Polygnotus (talk) 02:09, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- You have made your opinion clear. Please refrain from bludgeoning and allow other people to weigh in on this. Also—and I fear to say this, lest I provoke you further, but I feel it needs be said—you have been unacceptably rude at several points in this discussion (not to me, but to ProfGray and Rhododendrites). We can disagree about policies, including extremely important policies like BLP and NPA, without resorting to incivility and personal attacks of our own. Please bear that in mind. Thanks, —Compassionate727 (T·C) 06:48, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Compassionate727 That is not very compassionate of you. If you understood the situation, you would scold Rhododendrites. But you'll probably find the suggestion that there are things you do not understand "impolite" again, although it is a neutral observation of a fact. Polygnotus (talk) 08:19, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- You have made your opinion clear. Please refrain from bludgeoning and allow other people to weigh in on this. Also—and I fear to say this, lest I provoke you further, but I feel it needs be said—you have been unacceptably rude at several points in this discussion (not to me, but to ProfGray and Rhododendrites). We can disagree about policies, including extremely important policies like BLP and NPA, without resorting to incivility and personal attacks of our own. Please bear that in mind. Thanks, —Compassionate727 (T·C) 06:48, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Compassionate727 They are not appropriate for en:Antisemitism on Wikipedia, because as the uploader ProfGray said themselves in a comment above:
Are you concerned that the images themselves are "accusations of antisemitism" -- I ask because that is not how they are presented by scholars IIRC
(emphasis added by me). This sounds like using them to illustrate antisemitism would either fall under en:Wikipedia:Original research or en:WP:SYNTH. Nakonana (talk) 08:22, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- It is not. There is no article on Wikipedia on which these images are appropriate. Polygnotus (talk) 02:09, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Well, they were being used at en:Antisemitism on Wikipedia. I think discussion at en:Talk:Antisemitism on Wikipedia over whether they are appropriate is still ongoing. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:40, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Compassionate727: where are you saying #1 and #2 are currently being used? - Jmabel ! talk 01:33, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete all per Pi.1415926535. Either way screenshot 3 should be unambiguously deleted: its usage at simplewiki makes the harassment charge quite clear. Hiàn (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- These categorizations uploaded by @Steven1991 are quite odd, file #3 has the categories: Racism, Antisemitism, Israel, History of Israel, History of the Middle East, and Judaism. Which gives me the impression of overcategorization designed to attract negative attention. Sev6nWiki (talk) 15:10, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Partial resolution: there seems to be strong consensus to delete File:Serial erasure of content in a Jewish history article by a user engaging in tendentious editing.jpg, and I shall do so. Please continue discussion for the other two files. - Jmabel ! talk 17:35, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Thought long and hard about this. Firstly to associate an identifiable non-notable yet identifiable individual with a negative trait (antisemitism, Holocaust minimization, ect) should require incredibly strong sourcing. One case study in a reputable journal almost gets us there, but not quite. Given that the GA reviewer has a stable online identity and is trivially identifiable, I'd like multiple sources, over some period of time, discussing the Good Article review in screenshot 1 before allowing it on Commons. The Evelyn727 diff (screenshot 2) is a little different; that account has very few edits, and is essentially anonymous. However, the text they are removing in that diff is criticism given by NGO Monitor, the association that the paper's authors have connections to. As such, there's a inherent conflict of interest between the authors of the paper and NGO Monitor's work - of course the organization might have a vested interest in having their opinions spread further on Wikipedia, of course they might be annoyed if they were edited out or changed. Given that COI, I don't think we should keep that screenshot either. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 10:29, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: This is going to be a bit of a longer close rationale, but I feel it necessary. At time of deletion, the two remaining files were not in use. Simple screenshots of Wikipedia edits are generally out of scope for Commons unless they illustrate a software feature or are being actively used in educational or informational content across Wikimedia projects. While the diffs may be mentioned in academic papers, the screenshots themselves are not published or referenced directly in those sources, and their presence on Commons appears unnecessary. If the intent is to illustrate the edit content, local projects such as English Wikipedia recreated these using en:Template:Text diff or link directly to diffs (or choose to host such images locally under project-specific policies). Moreover, the descriptive captions and past use in article space have raised concerns that these files may misrepresent source material or contribute to editorial disputes, particularly in BLP-sensitive areas. Commons must not be used as a platform to pursue grievances, harass individuals, or carry on off-wiki conduct disputes by proxy. Hosting files with the apparent aim of discrediting or pressuring users on another project violates the collaborative spirit of the Wikimedia movement and is inconsistent with Commons' educational mission. Some may argue that these screenshots provide historical context or documentation of a notable editing dispute, but Commons is not a repository for archiving every version of on-wiki content, particularly when the material is already preserved in the page history or accessible through permanent diff links. If the educational value lies in the substance of the edit rather than its visual form, diffs and locally rendered text diffs are more appropriate and less prone to being taken out of context or misused. Without clear integration into educational content, the retention of these screenshots becomes indistinguishable from hosting them for the sake of documentation or personal dispute tracking, which is contrary to COM:NOTHOST and COM:SCOPE. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:14, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Complex logo, permission needed. Jonteemil (talk) 00:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a simple logo under {{PD-textlogo}}. ChemSim (talk) 16:12, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- What? Can you please tell me how w:File:American Airlines logo 2013.svg, File:2011 Disney Junior logo.png, File:PBS logo 2019.svg among others, all clearly are more complex than this coat of arms? To me it seems the other way around. The fact that you say that it's not only a simple logo, but clearly a simple logo surprises me a lot. Jonteemil (talk) 21:23, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; TOO is lower in UK than USA. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:13, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Might be above COM:TOO Faroe Islands which doesn't exist. Jonteemil (talk) 00:15, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Threshold of originality is presumably similar to Denmark, which is fairly high for logos. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:50, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Why do you say it's fairly high for logos? COM:TOO Denmark only gives us one example that is a logo, that is the WWF panda but I'm not even convinced it's because of TOO reasons it's unprotected, it might be for some other reason. If you look elsewhere in the Nordics, the TOO is pretty low. Jonteemil (talk) 07:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, because the WWF panda is a good example to gauge the threshold in Denmark. It is listed as an example in the threshold section and what would the other reason be? Extrapolation from nation to territory makes a lot more sense than extrapolation because of other regional and cultural similarities. UK, Canada, Australia and the US have a shared language and many similar cultural elements, but their copyright norms have significantly diverged. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:19, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a simple logo under {{PD-textlogo}}. I have changed the license accordingly. ChemSim (talk) 16:13, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:14, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO Australia which is very low. Jonteemil (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Too complex for {{PD-simple}}. Needs another free license or to be deleted. Jonteemil (talk) 00:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a simple logo under {{PD-textlogo}}. I have changed the license accordingly. ChemSim (talk) 16:15, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- What? Can you please tell me how w:File:American Airlines logo 2013.svg, File:2011 Disney Junior logo.png, File:PBS logo 2019.svg among others, all clearly are more complex than this coat of arms? To me it seems the other way around. The fact that you say that it's not only a simple logo, but clearly a simple logo surprises me a lot. Jonteemil (talk) 21:23, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: The artwork at the center depicting people looks to me to make it above TOO. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too complex for {{PD-simple}}. Needs another free license or to be deleted. Jonteemil (talk) 00:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep Clearly a simple logo under {{PD-textlogo}}. ChemSim (talk) 16:15, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- What? Can you please tell me how w:File:American Airlines logo 2013.svg, File:2011 Disney Junior logo.png, File:PBS logo 2019.svg among others, all clearly are more complex than this coat of arms? To me it seems the other way around. The fact that you say that it's not only a simple logo, but clearly a simple logo surprises me a lot. Jonteemil (talk) 21:22, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; artwork depicting cityscape and trees seems above TOO; certainly isn't just simple text. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:17, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Too complex for {{PD-simple}}. Needs another free license or to be deleted. Jonteemil (talk) 00:33, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a simple logo under {{PD-textlogo}}. ChemSim (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- What? Can you please tell me how w:File:American Airlines logo 2013.svg, File:2011 Disney Junior logo.png, File:PBS logo 2019.svg among others, all clearly are more complex than this coat of arms? To me it seems the other way around. The fact that you say that it's not only a simple logo, but clearly a simple logo surprises me a lot. Jonteemil (talk) 20:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination;artwork above simple text & geometry; not shown to be PD for any other reason. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:19, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
I have doubts that this is the user's own work. At File:Aeromexico 737.jpg (which I tagged as lacking permission a few days ago), the source is listed as "facebook.com" and the author "Unknown author". Given the jpg file and this file are the same photo but in different formats (notice how the planes at the back are at the same positions) I don't see any reason the two files should be tagged differently, so it's likely the case both photos are sourced from Facebook because if this was the author's own work they wouldn't need to say the source is FB in the jpg file. S5A-0043🚎 04:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Same photo previously deleted (slightly different cropping) from same uploader; if the earlier upload was by "unknown" from facebook, now claiming it as "own work" seems highly dubious. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:22, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Copyright violation-The Reddit user made a post 6 years ago, but there is an older website with the same picture, and no dedication to the public domain. Battlesnake1 (talk) 05:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:24, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Not own work. The artist died in 2006. Work still protected by law. HeminKurdistan (talk) 06:43, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. Do we know anything about the publication history for this (particularly with regard to copyright notices)? As a US work from the 1970s, that is more important than his date of death. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:48, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. False license & claim; no indication it is free licensed for any other reason has been presented. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:25, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BottleOfChocolateMilk as no permission (No permission since) Krd 08:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- How can a non-existing account nominate this file for deletion? BottleOfChocolateMilk page does not exist. Are we being hacked? Doctordawg (talk) 08:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Ironic, coming from a user that also has no page.
- Anohthterwikipedian (talk) 23:28, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, lacking information needed to establish license status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BottleOfChocolateMilk as no permission (No permission since) Krd 08:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: screengrab from linked/unsourced video with no indication original author gave free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:27, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry, low quality over all, not useful Kritzolina (talk) 09:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - not blurry, no quality problem, illustrates event as categorized. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
very low quality, blurry Kritzolina (talk) 09:50, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: in use in 3 projects. (I agree the quality is poor, and we have alternative images in significantly better focus. But while in use, kept.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 16 July 2025 (UTC). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Falsified original history map. Wikipedia should based on modern reliable academic sources. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Attribution
The user has a massive sockpuppet army creating many fake history maps by own personal fantasy, spreading them to articles by his own army, many examples for his similar activity: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Spiridon_Ion_Cepleanu
This map also has many historical errors: the title is 13th century = 1200s. Principality of Transylvania was 1570-1711 and not in 1200s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Transylvania_(1570–1711)
Maramaros was not part of Moldavia, and Fogaras was not part of Wallachia, even Moldavia was founded in 1346, Wallachian in 1330: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldavia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallachia
I also do not know what does it mean "lower Hungary", there is not a such historical or administration name. I also really do not know what does it mean "subordinate entities"" a very big part of eastern area of Kingdom of Hungary. Kingdom of Croatia was in personal union (same king) not "subordinate entity" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hungary
There is no academic ethnic map of 1200s, but the user artibrary claim ethnic dotted areas by his own fantasy. OrionNimrod (talk) 09:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Delete per sockpuppetry and violation of ban --Norden1990 (talk) 20:17, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; unused dubious map by indef blocked uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Who is the painter? 186.172.61.5 10:15, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Renato Rocha Ribeiro, Clearly stated on the file description. ([2]). Painter is also the uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:37, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:37, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Link is not found on Flickr. Nothing on the the Internet Archive. No way to verify the licence. Syrus257 (talk) 11:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. The purpose of verification on Flickr uploads is to make sure that the license is valid. While the file was not archived by the Wayback Machine, it seems clear from the upload history that this file was at this URL. Details from Flickr get automatically imported on upload and there is nothing suspicious here. Looking at the root information for the Flickr account, it also seems clear that the account does belong to USAID. As a US federal government image, this must be in the public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:09, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 12:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Completamente de acuerdo. Debería borrarse directamente, sin necesidad de haber abierto esta discusión, yo estoy solicitando directamente que sea borrada. --JuanAntonioRios19 (talk) 18:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- "These others also break the rules!" is not a valid argument. There are more fake micronations on Commons than real ones: at some point we need to make a cut. Feel free to go after Angyalistan, they do not have an own article and "only" participate in fake-nation conferences.
- The Whangawhanga one is actually a commune, apparently. See there - checking... hmmm. Yeah, this has real-world background, the articles have no chance to get deleted, so neither do the municipal flags. --Enyavar (talk) 19:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Son imagenes que obtuve de internet, y no tengo ninguna titularidad sobre las mismas JuanAntonioRios19 (talk) 01:43, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @JuanAntonioRios19: Solo decir que 1) la razón del borrado del archivo que se está debatiendo no es por razones de titularidad de derechos, sino porque cae fuera de COM:SCOPE; 2) si quieres que se borren los otros archivos, deberías proponer consultas de borrado en cada uno de ellos, además que no tiene sentido mencionarlos acá; 3) yo soy el creador del diseño de la bandera, y efectivamente tu subiste el archivo sin consultarme, y solo después de que yo corregí la información del archivo para aclarar su autoría y permitir su uso en Commons, vienes a reclamar su borrado. Todo lo anterior me parece propio de un comportamiento poco serio y razonable de su parte. Saludos cordiales. SamuelInzunza (talk) 22:52, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Con más motivo entonces, esto es ficción simplemente y no la bandera de un país. Más razones para un borrado directo. JuanAntonioRios19 (talk) 22:55, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- @JuanAntonioRios19: Solo decir que 1) la razón del borrado del archivo que se está debatiendo no es por razones de titularidad de derechos, sino porque cae fuera de COM:SCOPE; 2) si quieres que se borren los otros archivos, deberías proponer consultas de borrado en cada uno de ellos, además que no tiene sentido mencionarlos acá; 3) yo soy el creador del diseño de la bandera, y efectivamente tu subiste el archivo sin consultarme, y solo después de que yo corregí la información del archivo para aclarar su autoría y permitir su uso en Commons, vienes a reclamar su borrado. Todo lo anterior me parece propio de un comportamiento poco serio y razonable de su parte. Saludos cordiales. SamuelInzunza (talk) 22:52, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Son imagenes que obtuve de internet, y no tengo ninguna titularidad sobre las mismas JuanAntonioRios19 (talk) 01:43, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Neutral: After consulting @Enyavar about the aspects of COM:SCOPE that were relevant to whether or not this file should be deleted (see User_talk:Enyavar#RE:_Deletion_request_of_File:Bandera_República_Pelotuciana.png), I fully understand the reasons, and while I have no problem with the image remaining on Wikimedia Commons, I'm also not against its deletion. If the community decides to delete the file, I will agree. SamuelInzunza (talk) 23:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:42, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:16, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
COM:FOP Iran, also no source HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
[no reason given by uploader] Hossein simaei Hossein simaei (talk) 13:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:18, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:23, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of project scope because no educational usefulness. Tangopaso (talk) 18:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Allowable personal image. Uploader has hundreds of edits on Arabic Wikipedia. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle, in use too. --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Copie de https://angorussia.com/lifestyle/hariana-veras-fala-do-processo-de-adaptacao-nos-eua-enquanto-jornalista-angolana-residente/ ou de https://www.facebook.com/platinaline/posts/jornalista-angolana-recebe-hard-pass-do-gabinete-de-imprensa-da-casa-branca-nos-/4666159396731965/ (published in 2021) Habertix (talk) 23:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
L’image a été déjà bien avant OtikolenoiL (talk) 21:25, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- @OtikolenoiL: je ne comprends pas votre phrase. / I don't understand your sentence. -- Habertix (talk) 22:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je disais que l’image a été récupérée par le propriétaire, si cela ne respecte pas les droits… prière de la supprimer ! Merci beaucoup. OtikolenoiL (talk) 10:43, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
copied from https://bmcenter.ru/Files/Suharev_IR Ske (talk) 09:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:43, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Near-duplicate of File:Flag of the Manmasi National Christian Army.png. Janhrach (talk) 13:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:21, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: still in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
The same reason. No longer in use. Janhrach (talk) 20:03, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Replaced by File:Flag of the Manmasi National Christian Army.png. --ChemSim (talk) 06:49, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Not own work, apparently copied from Reddit. Janhrach (talk) 13:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Furthermore, the original logo is not documented by the organization. Farcazo (talk) 18:06, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 13:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Some Throwaway21q (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Since it was "founded" in 2022, amidst the Syrian Civil War, and not used in any articles, I am reasonably certain that this was not a recognized or widespread movement
- File:Hauran - Location Map (2022).png
- File:Hauran(Syria).png
- File:Hauran (orthographic projection).png
- File:Flag of Hauran Micronation.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Enyavar (talk) 13:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zechchuber (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 14:00, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work. Permission needed. Jonteemil (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
album cover --Mannivu · ✉ 14:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:52, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
If you're there, I'm sorry for giving you extra work. It's my first time making IPA charts and I'm so, so sleepy. Plus I'm having a phone call at the same time. Pvanp7 (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. (Personal details not needed. Hope you got some sleep.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:53, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Permission needed if not deemed below TOO. Jonteemil (talk) 14:18, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:53, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
- File:Arms of Villevoiche (micronational).svg
- File:SVG Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Juniperia (Micronational).svg
- File:Grand Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Juniperia (Micronational).png
- File:Crest of Séan Jhenaraine.png
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Enyavar (talk) 14:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:54, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 14:37, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:54, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Islesofcolibar (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
- File:Flag of the United Isles of Colibar.png
- File:Royal Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of the United Isles of Colibar.png
Enyavar (talk) 14:50, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:08, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:08, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 15:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flags/logos of a micronation)
- File:Nuvola Estuarian flag.svg
- File:Flag of Estuaria.svg
- File:Nuvola Verd'landian flag.svg
- File:Flag of the United States of Akkerman.svg
- File:Flag of Verd'land.svg
Enyavar (talk) 15:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 15:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SirBonverne (talk · contribs)
[edit]If there is a "Munaland", Google thinks it's in Kenya, not near Brasil. Suspect this is a fake country, flag & crest.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Delete out of COM:SCOPE. Kathisma (talk) 01:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 06:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SirBonverne (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flags/logos/map of a micronation)
- File:Flag of Blumenstein.svg
- File:Coat of Arms of the Principality of Parque Santiago.svg
- File:Flag of the Principality of Parque Santiago.svg
- File:Coat of Arms of Feltersbourg.svg
- File:PML South America Location.png
Enyavar (talk) 15:40, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 15:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:10, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". Indonesia 2006 (talk) 13:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
From Geography Now's video. Since this is not a real government's flag, this may be copyrighted. May be {{PD-ineligible}} and maybe {{PD-text}}, but it's a fictional sript, so... 78.83.124.250 23:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The source of this is a United States YouTube channel. Given the high threshold of originality at COM:TOO US, I think {{PD-ineligible}} certainly applies. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --MB-one (talk) 18:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 15:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Seeing now that this has been discussed before; I cannot see why "Out-of-Scope" was not a valid reason for deletion. The flag is only used in article drafts and user galleries about fake nations; and has been created for an April 1st hoax in the last decade. --Enyavar (talk) 17:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Geography Now has 3.74 million subscribers and a Wikipedia page, the video about this has 1.6 million views REAL 💬 ⬆ 18:15, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I've watched that video too. As a media personality, he certainly is relevant. Articles about him need to be kept. If this flag were his channel logo? Sure, keep it.
- His video about Afghanistan from the same year has almost 4 million views by now. But even so, Afghanistan's flag is independently relevant, and even has an own Wikipedia article. If he featured an alternate-history Afghanistan flag, even 10 million views would not make it relevant.
- Bandiaterra on the contrast, invented entirely by himself for April's Fools Day, and only featured in this one video with apparently no outside reception (or is there?), would not cross the Wikipedia notability threshold. Just like all the other fake nations on Category:NationStates, this is entertainment and not educational content. Best regards, --Enyavar (talk) 20:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- This is Commons and not Wikipedia. Files on Commons "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose" - something doesn't need to be real for it to be educational. If something got a million views it is probably useful for an educational purpose. REAL 💬 ⬆ 23:01, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oh really? 3.6 Million views cannot be wrong, this is probably useful for educational purposes.
- Oh wait no. No, it's not. It's fictional entertainment stuff. --Enyavar (talk) 00:47, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Are you seriously trying to argue Futurama would not be in scope if it was under a free license? REAL 💬 ⬆ 01:44, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- I am seriously trying to say that "millions of people have seen a fake documentary" is not a reason to keep its fake symbols. We keep toaster diagrams that only ever had a hundred viewers, because these diagrams are educational. Fake flags are not.
- Only now do I realize that there are more of them in the "GeographyNow!" category. Three of them (of fake-countries Sovonthak, ULULIONA-LINULU and LIMBERWISK) are falsely sourced with the exact same Bandiaterra video; the Fake country of Amberdash is sourced with its own video; Qitzikwaka and Volanka are fully unsourced. I suspect that there are more floating on Commons that nobody even connected with his category.
- But why are we hosting fantasy flags that were used as visual aids in April Fool's jokes? They are fake symbols of fake countries that only serve as inside jokes. They make their creator look like someone who exclusively peddles fake-news. There is simply no realistic educational purpose. Another point is that at least the four flags with more than just abstract geometric shapes are also under his copyright (unless you tell me he released them under CC license). --Enyavar (talk) 12:17, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Are you seriously trying to argue Futurama would not be in scope if it was under a free license? REAL 💬 ⬆ 01:44, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- This is Commons and not Wikipedia. Files on Commons "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose" - something doesn't need to be real for it to be educational. If something got a million views it is probably useful for an educational purpose. REAL 💬 ⬆ 23:01, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Used in enough good-faith drafts that this seems to be in scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:23, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Personal user galleries and drafts that won't be published? Those don't really count. Please compare Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vistulia location map.svg. --Enyavar (talk) 11:43, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- If it was just one user who was doing this, then I would agree with you, but it seems to have independent good-faith usage across multiple projects and by multiple editors. The comparative example you give seems to be one person's pet project. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:30, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- I really don't understand that logic. Wikipedians constantly copy each other's stuff for translations, and that is apparently also the case here. Furthermore, none of the drafts require entries to be flagged.
- If you check the one (!!) draft and the two personal user page projects, you will see that
the draft in en-WP is a 2023 offshoot from en:List of fictional countries set on Earth which itself got sanitized in 2025. The draft still includes 56 locations from GRR Martin's Ice+Fire saga, totally contrary to the list definition that says all entries needed to be located on the surface of Earth, and need not to be (fictional) states. Weirdly enough, Bandiaterra is the only GN! fictional state included, despite GN! producing a similar prank each year. But anyway: Only a few of the entries between A and B are flagged, while the whole rest is not: flags are optional for that list. In my eyes, that whole project is a huge ill-advised mess anyway. - The user page in de-WP is a flat-out copy of a 2022 version of the same original en-WP list. Gripweed attempted to translate it and stopped after letter D. It's not an independent project; and I would doubt it would be allowed into de-WP without the same sanitation that also cleared up the English original.
- --> Both of these lists above have Bandiaterra included because of this entry
- The user page in es-WP seems superficially to be an independent project from the two above, but also includes a whole lot of bogus entries that the other two did not allow. No sources needed, let alone notablity. Dozens of flags linked there have already been removed from Commons. Even so, only entries marked in green and blue were apparently taken seriously by Aitorembe. Bandiaterra is an uncolored red-link-entry without any description... actually like most in the list.
- Oh, and the Commons flag list falsely claimed it to be a micronation (instead of a fictional one). Well that is false so I removed the entry now. --Enyavar (talk) 23:47, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- If it was just one user who was doing this, then I would agree with you, but it seems to have independent good-faith usage across multiple projects and by multiple editors. The comparative example you give seems to be one person's pet project. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:30, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion - it is fiction, but apparently notable fiction. (Any usage or categorization should make sure to show it is fictional.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
also
These are copyrighted weather charts published by the Japan Meteorological Agency(JMA). Website's terms of use of JMA do not apply to publications outside of the website. PDL1.0 and GJSTU-2.0 do not apply to contents in National Diet Library Digital Collection. Peka (talk) 15:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, according to the source link, the chart files are labelled as “インターネット公開（許諾）”, which according to the table in the Terms of Use [3], it means “used with permission of the copyright holder”. So, permission from the copyright holder (Japan Meteorological Agency) is required. Tvpuppy (talk) 19:02, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:48, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:19, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Son3theJayhawker (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 16:28, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Doubtful that this is a photo of the 2 presidents mentioned as César Gaviria president of Colombia in the 1990's and this bad quality photo seems from the 1960's Pierre cb (talk) 16:39, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: DW of inadiquately sourced original. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 16:57, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy keep You'll see this in FOTW website. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 21:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- What is an FOTW website? Featured Of The Week? The image is currently unused, aside from fake flag galleries. --Enyavar (talk) 12:05, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nope. If I'm being specific, it stands for "Flags of the World". The Flags of the World website.
- Seen somewhere at [4]. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 19:28, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Aha. This leads to more questions: Who is the authority behind this Fotw website, and why is it considered an official source for flags? I see that en:Free Territory of Freedomland does not use the flag...
- oh, because File:Free Territory of Freedomland Flag.svg was deleted in 2022, missing permission. That certainly applies here as well, the "own work" tag seems dubious. --Enyavar (talk) 01:30, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- What is an FOTW website? Featured Of The Week? The image is currently unused, aside from fake flag galleries. --Enyavar (talk) 12:05, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
According to the uploader's own description, this is an original work with no reliable sources. The book mentioned is a large, very old Arabic book that isn’t focused on the Rustamids, and the contributor doesn’t specify a page number; he simply mentions it to mislead the reader. The contributor is also blocked on enwiki. As per COM:EDUSE guidelines, this content is irrelevant and lacks educational value. Riad Salih (talk) 17:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Similar to many maps of the Category:Maps of the Rustamid dynasty (and the similar history maps): unreliable content. This file is claimed to have been created in 1987 (dubious) and doesn't show any of the other regional powers which makes it highly suspect. Sadly, many similarly suspect files are currently in use in many projects: Editors first need to switch them against more reliable maps, before we can delete them.
- But at least add the following maps:
- File:La carte du royaume Rostémides - خريطة الدولة الرستمية - Map of Rustamid kingdom.png - unsourced, unused
- File:Rostémides.png - unsourced, unused
- File:Projet 17 1.png - unsourced, unused
- Delete --Enyavar (talk) 17:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
I fought I was ready to share my picture, but I'm not Could you please delete it. Josh Gavin (talk) 17:45, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. Uploaded more than a year ago, likely notable, and complies with UK freedom of panorama. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:33, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per comment, no evident reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:33, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
I fought I was ready to share my picture, but I'm not Could you please delete it. Josh Gavin (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Christian Ferrer. --Rosenzweig τ 08:13, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I fought I was ready to share my picture, but I'm not Could you please delete it. Josh Gavin (talk) 17:45, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. Uploaded more than a year ago, likely notable, and complies with UK freedom of panorama. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:34, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:34, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
I fought I was ready to share my picture, but I'm not Could you please delete it. Josh Gavin (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Christian Ferrer. --Rosenzweig τ 08:12, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I fought I was ready to share my picture, but I'm not Could you please delete it. Josh Gavin (talk) 17:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. Uploaded more than a year ago, likely notable, and complies with UK freedom of panorama. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:34, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:34, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
I fought I was ready to share my picture, but I'm not Could you please delete it. Josh Gavin (talk) 19:57, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Christian Ferrer. --Rosenzweig τ 08:13, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/symbols of a micronation)
Enyavar (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - The flag is sourced at http://www.obsidiagov.org/culture. Why nominate those micronation flags for deletion when some are sourced? ErrrrrWhat (talk) 23:28, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Commons is about educational content, not just any subjects that can be sourced somehow. This would become educational once there is not just a website dedicated to a broken rock, but a wikipedia article on the subject (and that won't happen, since this semi-cult it currently not notable). --Enyavar (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Xiamen University Malaysia files uploaded by Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad (talk · contribs)
[edit]A bunch of random images inside or around the university building of Xiamen University Malaysia. No educational value.
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Gym Room (4).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia cat (3).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia cat (2).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia D6 food (1).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia street view, 2025.jpg
- File:Parking lot at Xiamen University Malaysia (3).jpg
- File:Parking lot at Xiamen University Malaysia (2).jpg
- File:Parking lot at Xiamen University Malaysia (1).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Lingyun 6 (5).jpg
- File:厦门大学马来西亚分校停车场.jpg
- File:Classroom at Xiamen University Malaysia (2).jpg
- File:Classroom at Xiamen University Malaysia (1).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Lingyun 1 (1).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Lingyun 2 (3).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Lingyun 2 (2).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Lingyun 2 (1).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia cat (1).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia at night.jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Lingyun 6 (4).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Lingyun 6 (3).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Gym Room (3).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Gym Room (2).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Gym Room (1).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia cat.jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Lingyun 6 (2).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Lingyun 6 (1).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia swimming pool.jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Lingyun 8.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Lymantria (talk) 18:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete these images per nom, minimal educational value for them as they only depict common items (gym machines, canteen food, stray cats) that are not specific to Xiamen University Malaysia.
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Gym Room (3).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia Gym Room (4).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia cat (3).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia cat (2).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia cat (1).jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia cat.jpg
- File:Xiamen University Malaysia D6 food (1).jpg
- Keep the rest, I think these have educational value on showing what the en:Xiamen University Malaysia campus looks like, which we don’t have a lot of images of (if these were deleted). Tvpuppy (talk) 19:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: most no valid reason for deletion; the University is notable, nothing wrong with having various photos illustrative of various buildings etc. Some deleted per discussion (though no requirement to do so). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:38, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fiction (flag/logo/map of a micronation) Enyavar (talk) 18:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Image used in user Infobox. I would argue it is in as much scope as the image of myself. It’s completely unnecessary for anything but my user page. I don’t argue the deletion itself though, I could work around it, but hey, its scope is the same as the scope for my picture. I’m not notable enough for an article or any other use of it… 142.127.6.1 02:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- My phone didn’t connect Commons with Wikipedia… That was my reply. :) Kingdom of Baustralia (talk) 02:39, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, if that is the case, this belongs into Category:User page images. Best regards. --Enyavar (talk) 07:03, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: and recategorized per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:41, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vincent Ree (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
[edit]- File:JT TuckerOutLymphomaNight 25APR2015.png
- File:Southeast Corner of North Massapequa located in Massapequa School District.png
- File:1983-plainedge-high-school-yearbook-v0-yy8ijrjcsred1.webp
JT TuckerOutLymphomaNight 25APR2015.png is acknowledged as a screenshot in the description, with no evidence that the actual copyright holder licensed it under CC and GFDL. Southeast Corner of North Massapequa located in Massapequa School District.png is not the uploader's CC-licensed own work. I'm on the fence about it, though, as it came from a .gov website with credits to OSM and a bunch of U.S. government agencies. 1983-plainedge-high-school-yearbook-v0-yy8ijrjcsred1.webp could quite possibly be a {{PD-US-1978-89}} case, but it's definitely not the uploader's CC-licensed own work.-- RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 18:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; user apparently lacks authority to grant license for the images. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:42, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Copyright murkiness. Bdwagner uploaded these, claiming that they were Bdwagner's "own work", for use in en:Draft:Arthur F. Barbezat -- where they're presented as the work of Barbezat, who's described as having died in 1977. The long-dead don't upload files. Something is wrong. Incidentally, Bdwagner also uploaded three photographs (also described as Bdwagner's "own work") showing Barbezat but dated as long ago as 1938: that all three are the work of somebody uploading files to Commons beggars belief.
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Winter Day.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Ruins.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Frozen Over.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Scream.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Sleepy Day.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Tide Rising.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Fall.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Fleurier.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Coming Home.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Sunday Drive.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Lugano.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Winter Sprawl.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Winter Retreat.png
- File:Artbur Barbezat Oil Painting Vineyard.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Up a Creek.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Niagara.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Morocco.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Flowers.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Fall Foliage.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting A Quiet Night In.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Nude Nana.png
- File:Arthur Barbezat Oil Painting Matterhorn.png
Hoary (talk) 23:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Correction: For each "three" in the suggestion (above) to delete, please read "four". -- Hoary (talk) 23:12, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Are they claiming to be an heir of the artist's copyrights? {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}} --RAN (talk) 00:52, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- RAN, I think this question is better directly addressed to the uploader (and thus in the second person), linking both to an explanation of copyright transfer and to something VRT-related. (I leave this minor task to somebody more experienced in Commons matters than I am.) -- Hoary (talk) 22:51, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (may be undeleted if proper permission from heirs or other proof of free license recieved per COM:VRT). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
No public domain, Jean Beaumont died in 1989. Tekstman (talk) 10:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Tekstman: Are you positive it is this Jean Beaumont? Or do you mean someone else? I could not find much about this person. --Rosenzweig τ 23:18, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- I think I was too hasty. Indeed, I used the source you mentioned. Not sure it is the same Jean Beaumont at all.
- At the moment, I cannot find more about this individual. Public domain status is unclear. Tekstman (talk) 07:28, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. The file can be restored in 2048 with PD-old-assumed-expired, or 70 years pma if the actual year in which Jean Beaumont died can be established. The file is available at [5] if someone wants to research this. --Rosenzweig τ 11:54, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Per [6], it's pretty clear the artist is Jean-Georges Beaumont (Q131829790) (1895–1978). The file can be restored in 2049. --Rosenzweig τ 13:03, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep Only copyrightable element is the model photo, while the main subject is the shop facade. Also of interest is the shop vendor in front of it. The model photo is partly covered and superimposed with reflections, so I'm not sure what is there is enough to really exclude FOP. But even if that photo representation is considered to be striking enough to exclude it, I can blur it or cut it out from the photo. Darwin Ahoy! 11:05, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- I suggest blurring the photo of the model. Agree with nomination that the photo of the model is DW, but that without it the rest of the visible ad is unproblematic simple text. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:40, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: edited version; original upload with DW Deleted. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:15, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Tarekmehio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Suspicious own work claim. lack of metadata and proper size/resolution
HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, other unreliable claim by uploader, versions online elsewhere before Wikimedia upload. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no direct link to the image source, possible copyright infringement. عدو النسخ واللصق (talk) 13:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The link has been given. This is a crop of File:Nawal-el-saadavi.jpg which was uploaded by Mnasiri7 who claimed this to be their own work. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:32, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence for the license. Janhrach (talk) 13:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no support for claimed license found. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Change my mind MD sajjad hossain photography (talk) 16:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete as belated courtesy deletion, unused, digitally manipulated image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:18, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request, no counter argument. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded the image to Wikipedia and it ended up here. MD sajjad hossain photography (talk) 16:12, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment, uploader’s request but uploaded 15 days ago, log history suggested it was uploaded directly using UploadWizard. Tvpuppy (talk) 20:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; 15 days is out of usual automatic courtesy but not unreasonably late; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:37, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Kein eigenes Werk. Greift für das Bild Panoramafreiheit, weil das Wappen von öffentlichen Bereichen sichtbar und fotografierbar ist? GerritR (talk) 19:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems to be ok under freedom of panorama in Germany. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- Seems to be is slightly different from is, isn't it? We need to be sure. GerritR (talk) 19:28, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- Your parsing of my words is not helpful at all. You are also wrong. The standard of COM:PRP is "significant doubt". In my opinion there is no significant doubt that this complies with German FoP. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:09, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Seems to be is slightly different from is, isn't it? We need to be sure. GerritR (talk) 19:28, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: looks to me to be simple arrangement of PD elements and very short text. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Why again? Because this file is well above TOO (3D artwork, stone carving) and the concerns about FOP are still immanent. We need to know the place of this artwork before assuming FOP. GerritR (talk) 18:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Auf Deutsch: Die Ablehnung wegen geringer Schöpfungshöhe ist haltlos, es handelt sich um eine schutzwürdige Steinmetz- bzw. Bildhauerarbeit. Die Panoramafreiheit ist unbewiesen. Siehe auch https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2025/08#https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:OffenauS%25C3%25BCdzucker.jpg GerritR (talk) 18:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Probable bystander selfie. Original photographer would have to send perm to VRT JayCubby (talk) 19:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Taken by a waiter at the restaurant, yes. Give me a few days please to see if I can get a hold of them. Renerpho (talk) 23:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete (comment from uploader): Sadly I have been unable to reach anyone at the hotel. I have no good argument for how the file can be kept on Commons. :( Renerpho (talk) 22:27, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; uploader concurs. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:41, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too complex for {{PD-simple}}. Needs another free license or to be deleted. Jonteemil (talk) 00:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- This image is less complex than some of the examples on COM:TOO US. It seems to qualify for {{PD-simple}}. ⇒ Aerrapc they/them, 02:31, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- The middle part is quite complex IMO. Jonteemil (talk) 10:56, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- I think this logo is more complex than for example w:File:American Airlines logo 2013.svg, File:2011 Disney Junior logo.png, File:PBS logo 2019.svg which all are examples at COM:TOO US. Jonteemil (talk) 21:22, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Just because COM:TOO US contains other files less complex doesn't invalidate that it also contains files more complex. For example: Best Western logo.svg, JeetKuneDo.svg, and Nikken logo and wordmark.svg. For the record, I feel this way about most of the files I uploaded that you've nominated for deletion as well. ⇒ Aerrapc they/them, 20:39, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- I think this logo is more complex than them. Jonteemil (talk) 21:23, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Just because COM:TOO US contains other files less complex doesn't invalidate that it also contains files more complex. For example: Best Western logo.svg, JeetKuneDo.svg, and Nikken logo and wordmark.svg. For the record, I feel this way about most of the files I uploaded that you've nominated for deletion as well. ⇒ Aerrapc they/them, 20:39, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a simple logo under {{PD-textlogo}}. ChemSim (talk) 16:16, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Can you please tell me how w:File:American Airlines logo 2013.svg, File:2011 Disney Junior logo.png, File:PBS logo 2019.svg among others, all clearly are more complex than this coat of arms? To me it seems the other way around. The fact that you say that it's not only a simple logo, but clearly a simple logo surprises me a lot. Jonteemil (talk) 21:20, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the graphic is not simple enough. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Minorax as no permission (No permission since) Krd 08:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Question Why would we need a permission? Was it found somewhere else on internet? It was from 2007 so if it is resolution that is the issue then pls remember 2007 is long ago. --MGA73 (talk) 16:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)- Comment: This image is in use. So, for a 2007 image, unless there are problems with the uploader, perhaps Commons can keep it. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:12, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. I am normally for assuming good faith on very old uploads without EXIF, but that mark in the upper left is definitely not helping the case of this image. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:03, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment That's apparently the stage name of the person shown. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:24, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Could we get feedback from admin or regular of ms.w? Someone who understands Malay? Is the uploader on ms.w apparently reliable? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:24, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Kept: AGF for now, been on commons since 2007. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
This is a selfie by the journalist, not an own work (unless the account on Commons belongs to the journalist). HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Alhamedmoh:
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:20, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). → 
Deleted: per nomination, PCP, can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
Copyvio. Photograph by American photographer Harrison Forman (died 1978). [7] HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The copyright holder in the exif metadata cannot be linked to the user. Nv8200pa (talk) 14:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 15:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
COM:FOP Iran HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded the image to Wikipedia and it ended up here. MD sajjad hossain photography (talk) 16:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- What is the problem? Image can be used in Wikipedias -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:57, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: Previously uploaded elsewhere prior to Wikimedia Commons, require COM:VRT permission: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1023769579794664&set=pcb.1023779559793666. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Files in Category:Buhi Veterans Memorial Monument
[edit]There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines, and these freely licensed images infringe on the sculptural copyrights. The author was Cesar Gumba, a noted sculptor from Buhi. Undated, but likely post-1987 inferring from the Facebook post cited here.
- File:Buhi Veterance Memorial.JPG
- File:Buhi Veterans Memorial Monument, Cam Sur, May 2025.jpg
- File:Buhi Veterans Memorial.JPG
- File:Buhi Veterans Memorial1.JPG
- File:To the War Heroes of Buhi.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 04:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. Where do you get the 1987 year from? That statue looks like it has a lot of wear and tear. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:58, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle based on the Facebook post that I provided as a link in the artist's name above. The statue is not old, since its sculptor is still alive: as seen here, he is still active, and he was slated to appear in a local documentary work of "Savage Mind Bookshop" last year (2024). It is highly improbable that a Filipino sculptor of pre-1970 Filipino sculptures are still alive today, given that the latest and authoritative life expectancy figures for Filipino males (from WHO, 2021) was 63.4 years. The monument, being subject to wear and tear, is a normal occurrence due to the corrosive tropical climate here, and perhaps the lack of proper maintenance from the city government or whoever is tasked to properly maintain the artwork. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 23:41, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:40, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sharifrzvi1400 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Designer clothing protected by Iranian law.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:41, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
File obtained from prdc.ir, not a work by Mehr News Agency HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:23, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:41, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uruguaynomaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Needs permission if not deemed below TOO. Quite complex.
Jonteemil (talk) 14:50, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:43, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
If this is own work, why does it have the subject's business logo on it? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:53, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- I will reload it without the Logo, thank you. Tatelite (talk) 05:06, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- That does not address the question. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:40, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- I guess I don't understand the question. It is her picture, with her logo. Both her property. Is the request about having a logo in the picture? Or is the copyright in question? Tatelite (talk) 17:07, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Or, are you asking if this is a picture of Manuela Kelley? If this is your question, then the answer is yes. Tatelite (talk) 17:52, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- You state that it is "her property", yet you've uploaded it as "Own work" (i.e. you claim to be the creator and copyright holder). Who is the photographer - and why are you able to claim to be the copyright holder and release the image under a free license?
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:06, 11 August 2025 (UTC)If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). → - Thank you for the clarification.
- I am the photographer who took the original image, and I hold the copyright to it. The version with the logo was created at the subject’s request, but this does not affect my ownership of the underlying photograph.
- Since there were concerns about the logo, I have already uploaded a version without it to Commons. That version should avoid any additional design element issues while still meeting the licensing requirements.
- To further confirm, I am happy to send the file and a copyright release statement to the Permissions Verification team at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org so that the record is clear. Tatelite (talk) 18:07, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- You state that it is "her property", yet you've uploaded it as "Own work" (i.e. you claim to be the creator and copyright holder). Who is the photographer - and why are you able to claim to be the copyright holder and release the image under a free license?
- That does not address the question. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:40, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Ticket:2025082110008856 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 19:01, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: dw of the tatoos. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
Was ist am Foto denn auszusetzen?
Substantive parts of this image (not de minimis) are non-trivial computer graphics from a presumably non-free system (COM:DW fail). DMacks (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- das ist nicht der Rede wert, da es offiziell zum "ausprobieren und zum Foto machen" auf der IAA vorgestellt wurde. Elkawe (talk) 14:52, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Being allowed to take a photograph for oneself is not the same as granting an open license (see COM:DW). I do not know where this conference or exhibition was. COM:FOP rules vary by country. DMacks (talk) 19:52, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Also for file:
- File:Miss Korea 2012 (384).jpg
- File:Miss Korea 2012 (129) (cropped).jpg
- File:Miss Korea 2012 (128).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Courtesy deletion: per ticket:2025011110001787, subject wants deletion of photos in question. Takipoint123 (💬) 23:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Notable subject competing in public in a notable pageant. I do not see any potential valid rationale for deletion here. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:33, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle: It is a courtesy deletion, which I believe lies on the discretion of the deleting admin and is a valid deletion rationale by itself, although it is not sufficient that the person simply dislikes the photo (Commons:Photographs of identifiable people).
- The policy allows for deletions from the subject with good reasons (not too sure what this means), which is subject to discretion of sympathetic deletion by administrators. I just wanted to add additional context (this is public information posted by the verified account, NOT VRT info): the subject claims that this is an old photo they do not want to be associated with, and claims it is not representative of their current occupation and would like it's removal ([8])
- I have no personal opinion on keeping/deletion, however, but would like to leave further context for administrators. Thank you. Takipoint123 (💬) 22:48, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photos, unlikely to be educational. --Krorokeroro (talk) 10:15, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Private usage. Out of SCOPE. --Krorokeroro (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete--Krorokeroro (talk) 10:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep, this image was kept twice in previous DRs (as part of a mass nomination): Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sakurako Miki. I think this image is good quality and educationally useful for showing everyday life in Japan, and in particular, life in this Hokkaido ski resort. Tvpuppy (talk) 17:02, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep high quality--Trade (talk) 19:22, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per previous DRs. Nakonana (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:48, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:FOP Iran HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 03:35, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
The given file is not covered under GODL since it is a logo. Hence, not in public domain. KhubsuratInsaan (talk) 15:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 03:35, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
Cross-wiki penis spam, cf. luxo:Hoodz4u
- File:Human Male penis with retracted foreskin, glans.jpg
- File:Erect Male Penis with foreskin semi retracted.jpg
- File:Human male penis and testicles.jpg
- File:Human Male Penis and testicles.jpg
- File:Erect Human male penis with foreskin retracted.jpg
- File:HumanForeskin.jpg
Schniggendiller (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- File:Erect Human male penis with foreskin retracted.jpg and File:HumanForeskin.jpg are currently in use; Keep while that is so. (Both are mediocre quality photos, and there are probably better alternatives.) Delete the rest as undistinguished to low quality images of common objects we already have many better images of. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Why not delete also those two, replacing them with some of the many similar images you've got? What sense is there in keeping "undistinguished to low quality images of common objects we already have many better images of"?! 186.172.171.248 00:15, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- @186.172.171.248: Why don't you take care of replacing them yourself if you care about that, rather than whining that someone else hasn't already taken care of it for you? (Sheesh) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- I agree absolutely. This is makes no sense. It is pictures for education purpose. For the actual pages, its more reformed to be education then some perverse interpretation. If people need higher resolution photos, then maybe go to the commons. 2607:FEA8:C220:4600:CC65:B301:FEAE:18C7 06:07, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- @186.172.171.248: Why don't you take care of replacing them yourself if you care about that, rather than whining that someone else hasn't already taken care of it for you? (Sheesh) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Why not delete also those two, replacing them with some of the many similar images you've got? What sense is there in keeping "undistinguished to low quality images of common objects we already have many better images of"?! 186.172.171.248 00:15, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete all per IP Dronebogus (talk) 10:59, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I have deleted the unused files. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: done by Infrogmation, kept two that are COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 03:36, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is a current copyrighted TM image for AFC Ajax and because it is the logo of the football club in current use there for it can not be on the free domain. Govvy (talk) 17:12, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- It can certainly be in the public domain and trademarked at the same time. But I would check first that anonymous works in Netherlands come into the public domain after 70 years. Also we can try to find the original Ajax image that was used for this logo and check if there is any non-trivial contribution. — putnik 14:22, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Putnik: Per disclaimer All rights to any material on 'The Official Ajax Website' (all pages under the domain www.ajax.nl), including copyright, remain with AFC Ajax NV. All rights to club names and logos remain with their respective owners. It says copyright remains with AFC Ajax NV and given that the logo is copyrighted it can't be on wiki-commons for that reason. I have uploaded a slightly older version years ago to wikipedia, however you simply can't have this logo on wiki commons. Govvy (talk) 15:10, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- If it was anonymously published in 1928, all that copyright is expired already. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:45, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- However @PereslavlFoto: Trademark's are renewed every ten years, which makes the copyright renewed every ten years. And this is the case here. Lots of top level sports clubs do this to protect their product. Govvy (talk) 16:07, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Als een werk auteursrechtelijk beschermd is, geldt dat voor 70 jaar na de dood van de maker. Als het werk van een rechtspersoon is (BV of stichting bijvoorbeeld), dan is de termijn voor auteursrechtelijke bescherming 70 jaar na de eerste rechtmatige openbaarmaking van het werk. (Liaise Advocaten) --ManFromNord (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Paper program from 18 March 1930 (95 years ago). --ManFromNord (talk) 16:36, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- I feel you people are not understanding the distinction between Trademarks and basic copyright law. Nethertheless, if it's not deleted guess I just have to tell Ajax that wiki commons is breaking the law and then we have the long process of getting it removed. Govvy (talk) 18:20, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- The trademark laws have nothing in common with the copyright laws. Let's remember SONY trademark, for example. On the one hand, there's nothing copyrightable in these four letters, anyone may make copies of that word. On the other hand, noone may sell the goods marked with SONY trademark. As long as Wikimedia Commons does not sell any trademarked goods, we cannot break any trademark laws. What about Ajax warning, it looks very good, for Ajax will lose in court and will gain a very bad publicity. Do they really want to have such a bad publicity? -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Because this is a new updated variant ripped straight off their website, which is copyrighted and trademarked. You're not a lawyer are you, I am amazed. I guess you're not understanding the severity of this. Govvy (talk) 20:35, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Actually the trademark protection is a complete non-issue here. The only question that needs to be answered is: did the copyright expire? You may be amazed, but copyright expires separate from trademark rights. And trademark rights are not a valid reason for deletion at Wikimedia Commons, see COM:NCR. Jcb (talk) 09:26, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- Because this is a new updated variant ripped straight off their website, which is copyrighted and trademarked. You're not a lawyer are you, I am amazed. I guess you're not understanding the severity of this. Govvy (talk) 20:35, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- The trademark laws have nothing in common with the copyright laws. Let's remember SONY trademark, for example. On the one hand, there's nothing copyrightable in these four letters, anyone may make copies of that word. On the other hand, noone may sell the goods marked with SONY trademark. As long as Wikimedia Commons does not sell any trademarked goods, we cannot break any trademark laws. What about Ajax warning, it looks very good, for Ajax will lose in court and will gain a very bad publicity. Do they really want to have such a bad publicity? -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- I feel you people are not understanding the distinction between Trademarks and basic copyright law. Nethertheless, if it's not deleted guess I just have to tell Ajax that wiki commons is breaking the law and then we have the long process of getting it removed. Govvy (talk) 18:20, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Paper program from 18 March 1930 (95 years ago). --ManFromNord (talk) 16:36, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Als een werk auteursrechtelijk beschermd is, geldt dat voor 70 jaar na de dood van de maker. Als het werk van een rechtspersoon is (BV of stichting bijvoorbeeld), dan is de termijn voor auteursrechtelijke bescherming 70 jaar na de eerste rechtmatige openbaarmaking van het werk. (Liaise Advocaten) --ManFromNord (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- However @PereslavlFoto: Trademark's are renewed every ten years, which makes the copyright renewed every ten years. And this is the case here. Lots of top level sports clubs do this to protect their product. Govvy (talk) 16:07, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- If it was anonymously published in 1928, all that copyright is expired already. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:45, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Putnik: Per disclaimer All rights to any material on 'The Official Ajax Website' (all pages under the domain www.ajax.nl), including copyright, remain with AFC Ajax NV. All rights to club names and logos remain with their respective owners. It says copyright remains with AFC Ajax NV and given that the logo is copyrighted it can't be on wiki-commons for that reason. I have uploaded a slightly older version years ago to wikipedia, however you simply can't have this logo on wiki commons. Govvy (talk) 15:10, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- It is definitely the same logo as from 1930. @Jcb: where's the evidence that this was an anonymously designed logo? Abzeronow (talk) 03:38, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know. I have not made such a claim as far as I can see, I have not been involved in this file or this DR before today. But in this specific case it seems highly likely that the copyright was owned by the club, so I think we can safely assume that copyright expired by the end of 1998. Jcb (talk) 09:21, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, copyright of logo expired. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:23, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Copyvio files tagged as "own work," some are admittedly works by professional photographer Mani Golnazi, uploaded without consent. According to metadata, others are taken with a variety of cameras (Canon PowerShot SX200, Canon PowerShot SX120 I, SGH-F480, Canon PowerShot SX30 IS, SP550UZ) indicating that they are not owned by the uploader.
- File:Sina rajabi moghadam.jpg
- File:Jamalzade.jpg Delete Possibly post 1995. --RAN (talk) 02:52, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- File:Ferdosi-School-anzali0001.jpg
- File:Anzali-People-in-square.jpg
- File:Bandar-e-anzali-Drawbridge-001.jpg
- File:Bandar-e-anzali-Customs001.jpg
- File:Shapour-ST-bandar-e-anzali.jpg
- File:Anzali-People.jpg
- File:Ayatolah-pishvaee05.jpg
- File:Ayatolah-pishvaee04.jpg
- File:Ayatolah-pishvaee03.jpg
- File:Ayatolah-pishvaee02.jpg
- File:Ayatolah-pishvaee01.jpg
- File:Faghih-kia3.jpg
- File:Faghih-kia1.jpg
- File:Faghih-kia2.jpg
- File:AC-Borj-e-Tavoos.jpg
- File:Ahmad-AshourPuor-anzali02.jpg
- File:Ahmad-AshourPuor-anzali01.jpg
- File:Banaye-shahrdari-bandar-e-anzali.jpg
- File:Morteza besaratdar.jpg Delete Possibly post 1995.
- File:AC-Bandar-E-Anzali-Panorama-Arash-Rostamzad.jpg
- File:AC-anzali-Lagon-mani-golnazi2.jpg
- File:AC-anzali-Lagon-mani-golnazi3.jpg
- File:AC-anzali-Bird-mani-golnazi.jpg
- File:Simon Ayvazian.jpg Delete Possibly post 1995.
- File:AC-anzali-Mojshekan-mani-golnazi2.jpg
- File:AC-anzali-Menareh-mani-golnazi.jpg
- File:AC-anzali-Lagon-mani-golnazi.jpg
- File:AC-anzali-Sunset-Sea-mani-golnazi.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:37, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep The term for photographs in Iran is only 30 years from being made public or displayed, so 1995 is the cutoff. The USA has no copyright relationship, so they are in the public domain in the US too. If there was a smaller list of ones that are suspected of being newer than 1995, that would be helpful. --RAN (talk) 02:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- The date of creation differs from date of publication. These files are known to be made public on the internet in 2012 (so the 30 years span would end in 2042), there is no evidence of earlier publication. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: was deleted already by User:Pi.1415926535, assuming they forgot to close (maybe they can state a closing rationale below this?). —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 10:16, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Weird, I swear I clicked the button. In any case, deleted per HeminKurdistan's last comment - without a known pre-1995 publication, we cannot assume PD status. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2025 (UTC)